1984NeurosurgeryRequires access

Iohexol versus Metrizamide for Lumbar Myelography: Preliminary Report of Double-Blind Trial

Stephen S. Gebarski, Trygve O. Gabrielsen, James E. Knake, J T Latack, Julian T. Hoff

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

Lumbar myelography was performed in 38 patients; 19 received iohexol (an investigational aqueous contrast agent) and 19 received metrizamide. Iohexol is stable in solution, which is not the case with metrizamide. There was no other significant difference in diagnostic utility or quality between the two media. However, there was considerable postmyelography morbidity in the metrizamide group, but no postmyelography morbidity in the iohexol group. Preliminary clinical evidence suggests that iohexol is significantly superior to metrizamide as a contrast agent for lumbar myelography.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Lumbar myelography was performed in 38 patients; 19 received iohexol (an investigational aqueous contrast agent) and 19 received metrizamide. Iohexol is stable in solution, which is not the case with metrizamide. There was no other significant difference in diagnostic utility or quality between the two media. However, there was considerable postmyelography morbidity in the metrizamide group, but no postmyelography morbidity in the iohexol group. Preliminary clinical evidence suggests that iohexol is significantly superior to metrizamide as a contrast agent for lumbar myelography.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Lumbar myelography was performed in 38 patients; 19 received iohexol (an investigational aqueous contrast agent) and 19 received metrizamide. Iohexol is stable in solution, which is not the case with metrizamide. There was no other significant difference in diagnostic utility or quality between the two media. However, there was considerable postmyelography morbidity in the metrizamide group, but no postmyelography morbidity in the iohexol group. Preliminary clinical evidence suggests that iohexol is significantly superior to metrizamide as a contrast agent for lumbar myelography.

Key concepts: Metrizamide, Iohexol, Medicine, Myelography, Lumbar, Contrast medium, Radiology, Nuclear medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Iohexol versus Metrizamide for Lumbar Myelography: Preliminary Report of Double-Blind Trial — Research Paper | ScholarLens