2008Orthopaedic ProceedingsRequires access

ALIGNED FEMORAL RASPING IN CEMENTLESS TOTAL HIP > ARTHROPLASTUSING GUIDE INSIDE FEMORAL CANAL

Young-Bae Park, Suk-Hoon Park, Young Yong Kim, Yong-San Yoon

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In the cementless total hip arthroplasty, the position of the stem is pretty much determined by broach and rasping with which the is required for two reasons: one is to align the stem with the femur at the desired position and the orientation. The other is to achieve the conformity between the stem and the prepared proximal cavity surface in the femur. The robotic hip surgery can be a solution for the accurate of femoral canal shaping, but recent reports about the clinical follow-up study of the robotic hip surgery indicated frequent dislocation mainly due to the excessive soft tissue damage during robotic operation. In this paper, a guide being inserted into the femoral canal is proposed to restrict the undesired motion of the rasp inside the femur without extra incision. A set of canal guide and custom rasp for the selected stem(versys fibermetal midcoat, zimmer co.)were developed and tested with 4 synthetic femurs (model 1130, Sawbones co.). After rasping, a plastic copy of the stem was inserted into the femur and sliced at 5 mm thickness. From obtained cross sections, percentages of the gap larger than 0.3mm between the stem and the bone was measured. 6\_C\_Results: In average, 79% of bone-implant interface was close contact. Valgus/varus deviations of the stem were 0.40±0.45 degree, which means the angle of axis of straight reamer and axis of final cut. In average, 79% of bone-implant interface was close contact. Valgus/varus deviations of the stem were 0.40±0.45 degree, which means the angle of axis of straight reamer and axis of final cut. The conformity of femoral canal with the femoral stem in this approach was higher than the conventional hip surgery and comparable to those in the robotic surgery. The alignment of the stem within the femur is also as good as those in the robotic surgery(0.34±0.67 approach does require neither expensive system nor CT scan. Also this approach can be executed swiftly without extra time and unnecessary large incision compared with the robotic surgery.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the cementless total hip arthroplasty, the position of the stem is pretty much determined by broach and rasping with which the is required for two reasons: one is to align the stem with the femur at the desired position and the orientation. The other is to achieve the conformity between the stem and the prepared proximal cavity surface in the femur. The robotic hip surgery can be a solution for the accurate of femoral canal shaping, but recent reports about the clinical follow-up study of the robotic hip surgery indicated frequent dislocation mainly due to the excessive soft tissue damage during robotic operation. In this paper, a guide being inserted into the femoral canal is proposed to restrict the undesired motion of the rasp inside the femur without extra incision. A set of canal guide and custom rasp for the selected stem(versys fibermetal midcoat, zimmer co.)were developed and tested with 4 synthetic femurs (model 1130, Sawbones co.). After rasping, a plastic copy of the stem was inserted into the femur and sliced at 5 mm thickness. From obtained cross sections, percentages of the gap larger than 0.3mm between the stem and the bone was measured. 6\_C\_Results: In average, 79% of bone-implant interface was close contact. Valgus/varus deviations of the stem were 0.40±0.45 degree, which means the angle of axis of straight reamer and axis of final cut. In average, 79% of bone-implant interface was close contact. Valgus/varus deviations of the stem were 0.40±0.45 degree, which means the angle of axis of straight reamer and axis of final cut. The conformity of femoral canal with the femoral stem in this approach was higher than the conventional hip surgery and comparable to those in the robotic surgery. The alignment of the stem within the femur is also as good as those in the robotic surgery(0.34±0.67 approach does require neither expensive system nor CT scan. Also this approach can be executed swiftly without extra time and unnecessary large incision compared with the robotic surgery.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the cementless total hip arthroplasty, the position of the stem is pretty much determined by broach and rasping with which the is required for two reasons: one is to align the stem with the femur at the desired position and the orientation. The other is to achieve the conformity between the stem and the prepared proximal cavity surface in the femur. The robotic hip surgery can be a solution for the accurate of femoral canal shaping, but recent reports about the clinical follow-up study of the robotic hip surgery indicated frequent dislocation mainly due to the excessive soft tissue damage during robotic operation. In this paper, a guide being inserted into the femoral canal is proposed to restrict the undesired motion of the rasp inside the femur without extra incision. A set of canal guide and custom rasp for the selected stem(versys fibermetal midcoat, zimmer co.)were developed and tested with 4 synthetic femurs (model 1130, Sawbones co.). After rasping, a plastic copy of the stem was inserted into the femur and sliced at 5 mm thickness. From obtained cross sections, percentages of the gap larger than 0.3mm between the stem and the bone was measured. 6\_C\_Results: In average, 79% of bone-implant interface was close contact. Valgus/varus deviations of the stem were 0.40±0.45 degree, which means the angle of axis of straight reamer and axis of final cut. In average, 79% of bone-implant interface was close contact. Valgus/varus deviations of the stem were 0.40±0.45 degree, which means the angle of axis of straight reamer and axis of final cut. The conformity of femoral canal with the femoral stem in this approach was higher than the conventional hip surgery and comparable to those in the robotic surgery. The alignment of the stem within the femur is also as good as those in the robotic surgery(0.34±0.67 approach does require neither expensive system nor CT scan. Also this approach can be executed swiftly without extra time and unnecessary large incision compared with the robotic surgery.

Key concepts: Reamer, Femur, Femoral canal, Medicine, Valgus, Orthodontics, Implant, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
ALIGNED FEMORAL RASPING IN CEMENTLESS TOTAL HIP > ARTHROPLASTUSING GUIDE INSIDE FEMORAL CANAL — Research Paper | ScholarLens