High-level metonymy and linguistic structure
Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Olga Isabel Díez Velasco
Abstract
Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Olga Isabel Díez Velasco
Abstract
Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza and Olga I. Diez de Velasco take as a starting point a distinction between low-level metonymies (which make use of non-generic idealised cognitive models for their activation) and high level metonymies (which make direct use of generic idealised cognitive models) for the analysis of the different ways in which the second group of metonymies (high-level) have an influence on linguistic structure. They first study the influence of propositional high-level metonymies on stative predicates, nominal and verbal predicates, valency extension and reduction, argument structure, predication and modality ; and then they go on to describe the influence of situational high-level metonymies on indirect speech acts and what is called the 'What's X doing Y?' construction.
OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza and Olga I. Diez de Velasco take as a starting point a distinction between low-level metonymies (which make use of non-generic idealised cognitive models for their activation) and high level metonymies (which make direct use of generic idealised cognitive models) for the analysis of the different ways in which the second group of metonymies (high-level) have an influence on linguistic structure. They first study the influence of propositional high-level metonymies on stative predicates, nominal and verbal predicates, valency extension and reduction, argument structure, predication and modality ; and then they go on to describe the influence of situational high-level metonymies on indirect speech acts and what is called the 'What's X doing Y?' construction.
Key concepts: Metonymy, Linguistics, Valency, Argument (complex analysis), Extension (predicate logic), Mathematics, Psychology, Computer science