2013Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)Requires access

Redefining the Altarpiece in Renaissance Italy: Giotto's Stigmatization of Saint Francis and its Pisan Context

Donal Cooper

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Despite its autograph status and close iconographic relationship with the Saint Francis cycle at Assisi, Giotto's large panel of the Sigmatization in the Louvre occupies a marginal place in the literature on the artist. The painting, brought to Paris by Napoleon, has a secure provenance from San Francisco, Pisa, and has conventionally been identified as an altarpiece for a side chapel in that church. This article, based on extensive new archival research, establishes that the Sigmatization was not an altarpiece. Instead, there are strong arguments for it having been elevated above a choir screen or beam in the nave of San Francesco. As well as transforming our understanding of Giotto's panel and its intended function, these findings have significant implications for broader study of early Italian panel painting, challenging the traditional bias towards the altarpiece as the most dynamic genre of ecclesiastical image in the decades around 1300.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Despite its autograph status and close iconographic relationship with the Saint Francis cycle at Assisi, Giotto's large panel of the Sigmatization in the Louvre occupies a marginal place in the literature on the artist. The painting, brought to Paris by Napoleon, has a secure provenance from San Francisco, Pisa, and has conventionally been identified as an altarpiece for a side chapel in that church. This article, based on extensive new archival research, establishes that the Sigmatization was not an altarpiece. Instead, there are strong arguments for it having been elevated above a choir screen or beam in the nave of San Francesco. As well as transforming our understanding of Giotto's panel and its intended function, these findings have significant implications for broader study of early Italian panel painting, challenging the traditional bias towards the altarpiece as the most dynamic genre of ecclesiastical image in the decades around 1300.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Despite its autograph status and close iconographic relationship with the Saint Francis cycle at Assisi, Giotto's large panel of the Sigmatization in the Louvre occupies a marginal place in the literature on the artist. The painting, brought to Paris by Napoleon, has a secure provenance from San Francisco, Pisa, and has conventionally been identified as an altarpiece for a side chapel in that church. This article, based on extensive new archival research, establishes that the Sigmatization was not an altarpiece. Instead, there are strong arguments for it having been elevated above a choir screen or beam in the nave of San Francesco. As well as transforming our understanding of Giotto's panel and its intended function, these findings have significant implications for broader study of early Italian panel painting, challenging the traditional bias towards the altarpiece as the most dynamic genre of ecclesiastical image in the decades around 1300.

Key concepts: Altarpiece, Chapel, SAINT, Art, Painting, Context (archaeology), Art history, The Renaissance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Redefining the Altarpiece in Renaissance Italy: Giotto's Stigmatization of Saint Francis and its Pisan Context — Research Paper | ScholarLens