2002Nuclear Medicine CommunicationsRequires access

Follow-up of perfusion defects in pulmonary perfusion scanning after pulmonary embolism: are we too careless?

M. GOTTHARDT, M. SCHIPPER, Christiane Franzius, Martin Béhé, A. Barth, Tino Schurrat, H. Höffken, S. Gratz, Kuruvilla Joseph, Th. Behr

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Persisting perfusion defects may still be found in pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy months or years after pulmonary embolism. The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of persisting perfusion defects and the pattern of scintigraphic follow-up of patients after pulmonary embolism. Only those patients were included into our study who received pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy between 1991 and 1999, and who had perfusion defects including at least one whole segment. These perfusion defects were considered as persisting perfusion defects if unchanged over at least 1 year. From 3640 patients examined, 451 (12.4%) had perfusion defects meeting the criteria of this study. Of those, 129 (28.6%) received a scintigraphic follow-up. In 62 patients (48.1%), a reperfusion of the defects was found. In 38 patients (29.5%), the defects persisted within a follow-up period of up to 12 weeks. However, no pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy was performed thereafter. Out of the 129 patients receiving a scintigraphic follow-up, only 29 (22.5%) had a follow-up over more than 1 year, 19 of those had persisting perfusion defects. It is concluded that our data show an inadequate scintigraphic follow-up of patients with pulmonary embolism which may lead to unnecessary anticoagulant treatment if persisting perfusion defects are misinterpreted as fresh pulmonary embolism. In many cases, there was no further follow-up even if reperfusion of the defects was lacking in early follow-up.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Persisting perfusion defects may still be found in pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy months or years after pulmonary embolism. The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of persisting perfusion defects and the pattern of scintigraphic follow-up of patients after pulmonary embolism. Only those patients were included into our study who received pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy between 1991 and 1999, and who had perfusion defects including at least one whole segment. These perfusion defects were considered as persisting perfusion defects if unchanged over at least 1 year. From 3640 patients examined, 451 (12.4%) had perfusion defects meeting the criteria of this study. Of those, 129 (28.6%) received a scintigraphic follow-up. In 62 patients (48.1%), a reperfusion of the defects was found. In 38 patients (29.5%), the defects persisted within a follow-up period of up to 12 weeks. However, no pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy was performed thereafter. Out of the 129 patients receiving a scintigraphic follow-up, only 29 (22.5%) had a follow-up over more than 1 year, 19 of those had persisting perfusion defects. It is concluded that our data show an inadequate scintigraphic follow-up of patients with pulmonary embolism which may lead to unnecessary anticoagulant treatment if persisting perfusion defects are misinterpreted as fresh pulmonary embolism. In many cases, there was no further follow-up even if reperfusion of the defects was lacking in early follow-up.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Persisting perfusion defects may still be found in pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy months or years after pulmonary embolism. The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of persisting perfusion defects and the pattern of scintigraphic follow-up of patients after pulmonary embolism. Only those patients were included into our study who received pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy between 1991 and 1999, and who had perfusion defects including at least one whole segment. These perfusion defects were considered as persisting perfusion defects if unchanged over at least 1 year. From 3640 patients examined, 451 (12.4%) had perfusion defects meeting the criteria of this study. Of those, 129 (28.6%) received a scintigraphic follow-up. In 62 patients (48.1%), a reperfusion of the defects was found. In 38 patients (29.5%), the defects persisted within a follow-up period of up to 12 weeks. However, no pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy was performed thereafter. Out of the 129 patients receiving a scintigraphic follow-up, only 29 (22.5%) had a follow-up over more than 1 year, 19 of those had persisting perfusion defects. It is concluded that our data show an inadequate scintigraphic follow-up of patients with pulmonary embolism which may lead to unnecessary anticoagulant treatment if persisting perfusion defects are misinterpreted as fresh pulmonary embolism. In many cases, there was no further follow-up even if reperfusion of the defects was lacking in early follow-up.

Key concepts: Perfusion, Pulmonary embolism, Medicine, Scintigraphy, Perfusion scanning, Radiology, Lung, Embolism

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Follow-up of perfusion defects in pulmonary perfusion scanning after pulmonary embolism: are we too careless? — Research Paper | ScholarLens