1992•Justice System JournalRequires access

Restitution: The Victim’s viewpoint

Davis Robert C., smithm Barbara, Susan Hillenbrand

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

One of the recent changes that has made criminal courts more responsive to victims is a renewed emphasis on restitution. However, evidence suggests that, while judges now order restitution far more frequently, rates of collection are low. For many victims restitution becomes a hollow promise. This paper looks at the erpenence of victims with restitution and with the programs designated to collect restitution. It jinds that victim satisfaction with the restitution process is vey low, but that it could be increased by better collection efforts and better efforts to keep victims informed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

One of the recent changes that has made criminal courts more responsive to victims is a renewed emphasis on restitution. However, evidence suggests that, while judges now order restitution far more frequently, rates of collection are low. For many victims restitution becomes a hollow promise. This paper looks at the erpenence of victims with restitution and with the programs designated to collect restitution. It jinds that victim satisfaction with the restitution process is vey low, but that it could be increased by better collection efforts and better efforts to keep victims informed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

One of the recent changes that has made criminal courts more responsive to victims is a renewed emphasis on restitution. However, evidence suggests that, while judges now order restitution far more frequently, rates of collection are low. For many victims restitution becomes a hollow promise. This paper looks at the erpenence of victims with restitution and with the programs designated to collect restitution. It jinds that victim satisfaction with the restitution process is vey low, but that it could be increased by better collection efforts and better efforts to keep victims informed.

Key concepts: Restitution, Order (exchange), Political science, Law, Criminology, Business, Sociology, Finance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Restitution: The Victim’s viewpoint — Research Paper | ScholarLens