2011Journal of Statistics and Management SystemsRequires access

One-period asset allocation oddity with loss aversion utility

Ching-Ping Wang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This study considers a one-period asset allocation problem where the economy contains one riskless asset and only one risky asset. We show that the asset allocation is very odd and violates the investment practice for a typical loss aversion utility; that is, the possible investment proportions in risky asset include only zero, positive infinity and negative infinity. This result implies that the conventional increasing and concave utility is more suitable in explaining the practical one-period asset allocation behavior than the typical loss aversion utility.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study considers a one-period asset allocation problem where the economy contains one riskless asset and only one risky asset. We show that the asset allocation is very odd and violates the investment practice for a typical loss aversion utility; that is, the possible investment proportions in risky asset include only zero, positive infinity and negative infinity. This result implies that the conventional increasing and concave utility is more suitable in explaining the practical one-period asset allocation behavior than the typical loss aversion utility.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study considers a one-period asset allocation problem where the economy contains one riskless asset and only one risky asset. We show that the asset allocation is very odd and violates the investment practice for a typical loss aversion utility; that is, the possible investment proportions in risky asset include only zero, positive infinity and negative infinity. This result implies that the conventional increasing and concave utility is more suitable in explaining the practical one-period asset allocation behavior than the typical loss aversion utility.

Key concepts: Asset (computer security), Asset allocation, Infinity, Economics, Loss aversion, Investment (military), Microeconomics, Expected utility hypothesis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
One-period asset allocation oddity with loss aversion utility — Research Paper | ScholarLens