1958•Journal of Economic EntomologyRequires access

Effects of Chilling of Pupae on Subsequent Emergence of Resistant and Susceptible House Flies

Russell E. Siverly

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Pupae of the house fly (Musca domestica L.) were refrigerated for periods of from 1 to 8 days. Pupae from both DDT-susceptible and DDT-resistant strains were used. The effects of exposure to chilling of pupae were evaluated with reference to exposure interval and (1) numbers of subsequent emerged adults, (2) shifts in adult sex ratios, (3) delay in subsequent emergence. Results obtained from this study indicate that a linear relationship exists between time intervals in which house fly pupae are exposed to chilling and numbers of subsequent emerged adults. An approximate 9% reduction in emergence occurred for each day of exposure to chilling in the susceptible strain tested. A linear relationship also exists between time intervals in which house fly pupae are exposed to chilling and delay in subsequent emergence. Although no significant differences could be demonstrated, as a result of chilling, between susceptible and resistant house flies either in (1) emergence response, (2) deviation in sex ratio, or (3) retardation in emergence, the partial failure of resistant flies to successfully utilize the larval diet is noteworthy. Apparently, limiting factors in the larval diet were more selective against resistant females than against males of either strain.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Pupae of the house fly (Musca domestica L.) were refrigerated for periods of from 1 to 8 days. Pupae from both DDT-susceptible and DDT-resistant strains were used. The effects of exposure to chilling of pupae were evaluated with reference to exposure interval and (1) numbers of subsequent emerged adults, (2) shifts in adult sex ratios, (3) delay in subsequent emergence. Results obtained from this study indicate that a linear relationship exists between time intervals in which house fly pupae are exposed to chilling and numbers of subsequent emerged adults. An approximate 9% reduction in emergence occurred for each day of exposure to chilling in the susceptible strain tested. A linear relationship also exists between time intervals in which house fly pupae are exposed to chilling and delay in subsequent emergence. Although no significant differences could be demonstrated, as a result of chilling, between susceptible and resistant house flies either in (1) emergence response, (2) deviation in sex ratio, or (3) retardation in emergence, the partial failure of resistant flies to successfully utilize the larval diet is noteworthy. Apparently, limiting factors in the larval diet were more selective against resistant females than against males of either strain.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Pupae of the house fly (Musca domestica L.) were refrigerated for periods of from 1 to 8 days. Pupae from both DDT-susceptible and DDT-resistant strains were used. The effects of exposure to chilling of pupae were evaluated with reference to exposure interval and (1) numbers of subsequent emerged adults, (2) shifts in adult sex ratios, (3) delay in subsequent emergence. Results obtained from this study indicate that a linear relationship exists between time intervals in which house fly pupae are exposed to chilling and numbers of subsequent emerged adults. An approximate 9% reduction in emergence occurred for each day of exposure to chilling in the susceptible strain tested. A linear relationship also exists between time intervals in which house fly pupae are exposed to chilling and delay in subsequent emergence. Although no significant differences could be demonstrated, as a result of chilling, between susceptible and resistant house flies either in (1) emergence response, (2) deviation in sex ratio, or (3) retardation in emergence, the partial failure of resistant flies to successfully utilize the larval diet is noteworthy. Apparently, limiting factors in the larval diet were more selective against resistant females than against males of either strain.

Key concepts: Musca, Biology, Pupa, Larva, Toxicology, Limiting, Muscidae, Animal science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effects of Chilling of Pupae on Subsequent Emergence of Resistant and Susceptible House Flies — Research Paper | ScholarLens