2001PubMedRequires access

[Voice restoration with voice prosthesis after total laryngectomy. Assessment of survival time of 378 Provox-1, Provox-2 and Blom-Singer voice prosthesis].

Paul W. Schafer, N Klützke, Schwerdtfeger Fp

Open publisher page 27 citations

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Voice Restoration with Voice Prosthesis after Total Laryngectomy. Assessment of Survival Time of 378 Provox-1, Provox-2 and Blom-Singer Voice Prosthesis. BACKGROUND: Indwelling voice prosthesis are used in Trier for voice restoration after total laryngectomy since 1991. OBJECTIVE AND METHOD: To assess the voice prosthesis survival times the patients of the years 1993-1999 are assessed retrospectively. PARTICIPANTS: 58 patients provided with indwelling voice prosthesis were seen regularly at follow-up. 378 prosthesis were changed. Provox 1, Provox 2 and Blom-Singer-Prostheses were used. RESULTS: The average survival lifetime of the prosthesis was 224 days for Provox-1, 96 days for Provox-2 and 107 days for Blom-Singer respectively. There is no significant difference found between Provox-2 and Blom-Singer Prosthesis. The survival times of the Provox-1 Prosthesis is significant longer. CONCLUSION: Using indwelling voice prosthesis for voice restoration after total laryngectomy an average survival time of the prosthesis of three months can be expected. There are relevant individual differences. Provox-1 Prosthesis have a significantly longer survival time, but as they are more difficult to handle they are not suitable for routine use. The indication for the choice between Blom-Singer or Provox-2 Prosthesis should be influenced by the surgeons' experience.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

UNLABELLED: Voice Restoration with Voice Prosthesis after Total Laryngectomy. Assessment of Survival Time of 378 Provox-1, Provox-2 and Blom-Singer Voice Prosthesis. BACKGROUND: Indwelling voice prosthesis are used in Trier for voice restoration after total laryngectomy since 1991. OBJECTIVE AND METHOD: To assess the voice prosthesis survival times the patients of the years 1993-1999 are assessed retrospectively. PARTICIPANTS: 58 patients provided with indwelling voice prosthesis were seen regularly at follow-up. 378 prosthesis were changed. Provox 1, Provox 2 and Blom-Singer-Prostheses were used. RESULTS: The average survival lifetime of the prosthesis was 224 days for Provox-1, 96 days for Provox-2 and 107 days for Blom-Singer respectively. There is no significant difference found between Provox-2 and Blom-Singer Prosthesis. The survival times of the Provox-1 Prosthesis is significant longer. CONCLUSION: Using indwelling voice prosthesis for voice restoration after total laryngectomy an average survival time of the prosthesis of three months can be expected. There are relevant individual differences. Provox-1 Prosthesis have a significantly longer survival time, but as they are more difficult to handle they are not suitable for routine use. The indication for the choice between Blom-Singer or Provox-2 Prosthesis should be influenced by the surgeons' experience.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 27 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

UNLABELLED: Voice Restoration with Voice Prosthesis after Total Laryngectomy. Assessment of Survival Time of 378 Provox-1, Provox-2 and Blom-Singer Voice Prosthesis. BACKGROUND: Indwelling voice prosthesis are used in Trier for voice restoration after total laryngectomy since 1991. OBJECTIVE AND METHOD: To assess the voice prosthesis survival times the patients of the years 1993-1999 are assessed retrospectively. PARTICIPANTS: 58 patients provided with indwelling voice prosthesis were seen regularly at follow-up. 378 prosthesis were changed. Provox 1, Provox 2 and Blom-Singer-Prostheses were used. RESULTS: The average survival lifetime of the prosthesis was 224 days for Provox-1, 96 days for Provox-2 and 107 days for Blom-Singer respectively. There is no significant difference found between Provox-2 and Blom-Singer Prosthesis. The survival times of the Provox-1 Prosthesis is significant longer. CONCLUSION: Using indwelling voice prosthesis for voice restoration after total laryngectomy an average survival time of the prosthesis of three months can be expected. There are relevant individual differences. Provox-1 Prosthesis have a significantly longer survival time, but as they are more difficult to handle they are not suitable for routine use. The indication for the choice between Blom-Singer or Provox-2 Prosthesis should be influenced by the surgeons' experience.

Key concepts: Voice prosthesis, Laryngectomy, Prosthesis, Medicine, Surgery, Larynx, Audiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Voice restoration with voice prosthesis after total laryngectomy. Assessment of survival time of 378 Provox-1, Provox-2 and Blom-Singer voice prosthesis]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens