1977Public Administration ReviewRequires access

The Professionalization of Police: Efforts and Obstacles

Richard A. Staufenberger

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

(although the examination is not yet equivalent in rigor to the typical licensing examinations for more traditional professions). 16. Brian McLoughlin, Future the Planning Profession, in Peter Cowan (ed.), The Future Planning (Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1973), pp. 69-72. 17. Anthony J. Catanese, Planners Need Seal Approval, Practicing Planner, Vol. 6, No. 4 (September 1976), pp. 8-10. 18. The choice is between the American Institute Planners, as the accrediting body, or selecting: (1) a national, voluntary, non-profit, non-governmental Council on Post-Secondary Accreditation (COPA); (2) the Commissioner Education, Office Education, U.S. Department Health, Education, and Welfare; or (3) the Association Collegiate Schools Planning. 19. Alan Altshuler, The City Planning Process (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1965). 20. Francine F. Rabinovitz, City Politics and Planning (New York: Atherton Press, 1969). 21. Martin L. Needleman and Carolyn Needleman, Guerrillas in Bureaucracy (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1974). 22. Webster's defines maieutics as follows: of or relating to the dialectic method practiced by Socrates in order to elicit and clarify the ideas others. 23. John W. Dyckman, Three Crises American paper prepared for the Conference on Planning: Challenge and Response, Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University, September 8-9, 1976. 24. See Donald A. Schon, Nancy Sheldon Cramer, Paul Osterman, and Charles Perry, Planners in Transition: A Report a Survey Alumni M.I.T.'s Department Urban Studies, 1960-7 1, Journal the American Institute Planners, Vol. 42, No. 2 (April 1976), pp. 193-202; and Edward M. Bergman, George C. Hemmens, Susan A. Lieberman, and Robert M. Moroney, The Practitioners Viewpoint: An Exploration Social Policy Planning Practice and Education, Part 2: The Findings (Chapel Hill: Department City and Regional Planning, University North Carolina, March 1976).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

(although the examination is not yet equivalent in rigor to the typical licensing examinations for more traditional professions). 16. Brian McLoughlin, Future the Planning Profession, in Peter Cowan (ed.), The Future Planning (Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1973), pp. 69-72. 17. Anthony J. Catanese, Planners Need Seal Approval, Practicing Planner, Vol. 6, No. 4 (September 1976), pp. 8-10. 18. The choice is between the American Institute Planners, as the accrediting body, or selecting: (1) a national, voluntary, non-profit, non-governmental Council on Post-Secondary Accreditation (COPA); (2) the Commissioner Education, Office Education, U.S. Department Health, Education, and Welfare; or (3) the Association Collegiate Schools Planning. 19. Alan Altshuler, The City Planning Process (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1965). 20. Francine F. Rabinovitz, City Politics and Planning (New York: Atherton Press, 1969). 21. Martin L. Needleman and Carolyn Needleman, Guerrillas in Bureaucracy (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1974). 22. Webster's defines maieutics as follows: of or relating to the dialectic method practiced by Socrates in order to elicit and clarify the ideas others. 23. John W. Dyckman, Three Crises American paper prepared for the Conference on Planning: Challenge and Response, Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University, September 8-9, 1976. 24. See Donald A. Schon, Nancy Sheldon Cramer, Paul Osterman, and Charles Perry, Planners in Transition: A Report a Survey Alumni M.I.T.'s Department Urban Studies, 1960-7 1, Journal the American Institute Planners, Vol. 42, No. 2 (April 1976), pp. 193-202; and Edward M. Bergman, George C. Hemmens, Susan A. Lieberman, and Robert M. Moroney, The Practitioners Viewpoint: An Exploration Social Policy Planning Practice and Education, Part 2: The Findings (Chapel Hill: Department City and Regional Planning, University North Carolina, March 1976).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

(although the examination is not yet equivalent in rigor to the typical licensing examinations for more traditional professions). 16. Brian McLoughlin, Future the Planning Profession, in Peter Cowan (ed.), The Future Planning (Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1973), pp. 69-72. 17. Anthony J. Catanese, Planners Need Seal Approval, Practicing Planner, Vol. 6, No. 4 (September 1976), pp. 8-10. 18. The choice is between the American Institute Planners, as the accrediting body, or selecting: (1) a national, voluntary, non-profit, non-governmental Council on Post-Secondary Accreditation (COPA); (2) the Commissioner Education, Office Education, U.S. Department Health, Education, and Welfare; or (3) the Association Collegiate Schools Planning. 19. Alan Altshuler, The City Planning Process (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1965). 20. Francine F. Rabinovitz, City Politics and Planning (New York: Atherton Press, 1969). 21. Martin L. Needleman and Carolyn Needleman, Guerrillas in Bureaucracy (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1974). 22. Webster's defines maieutics as follows: of or relating to the dialectic method practiced by Socrates in order to elicit and clarify the ideas others. 23. John W. Dyckman, Three Crises American paper prepared for the Conference on Planning: Challenge and Response, Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University, September 8-9, 1976. 24. See Donald A. Schon, Nancy Sheldon Cramer, Paul Osterman, and Charles Perry, Planners in Transition: A Report a Survey Alumni M.I.T.'s Department Urban Studies, 1960-7 1, Journal the American Institute Planners, Vol. 42, No. 2 (April 1976), pp. 193-202; and Edward M. Bergman, George C. Hemmens, Susan A. Lieberman, and Robert M. Moroney, The Practitioners Viewpoint: An Exploration Social Policy Planning Practice and Education, Part 2: The Findings (Chapel Hill: Department City and Regional Planning, University North Carolina, March 1976).

Key concepts: Professionalization, Political science, Public administration, Criminology, Public relations, Sociology, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Professionalization of Police: Efforts and Obstacles — Research Paper | ScholarLens