2015MindRequires access

Putting Metaphysics First: Essays on Metaphysics and Epistemology, by Michael Devitt

Jussi Suikkanen

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Michael Devitt’s recent book Putting Metaphysics First collects together fifteen of his previously published articles on metaphysics and epistemology. I will first explain the basic crux of these articles, then give high praise for the volume, and finally raise a concern about his way of distinguishing antirealist views from realism in a given domain. The first chapter argues against David Armstrong’s realism about universals. It first explains why the One over Many argument is a pseudo-problem. Besides a basic story about how a given predicate ‘F’ can apply to many F things, no further explanation is needed for why objects a and b are F, and therefore no universals are needed to do explanatory work. Devitt then argues that, if there are any problems for the nominalists in this ballpark, these have to do with the need to provide translations of our talk about the properties of properties to a language that does not require the existence of universals.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Michael Devitt’s recent book Putting Metaphysics First collects together fifteen of his previously published articles on metaphysics and epistemology. I will first explain the basic crux of these articles, then give high praise for the volume, and finally raise a concern about his way of distinguishing antirealist views from realism in a given domain. The first chapter argues against David Armstrong’s realism about universals. It first explains why the One over Many argument is a pseudo-problem. Besides a basic story about how a given predicate ‘F’ can apply to many F things, no further explanation is needed for why objects a and b are F, and therefore no universals are needed to do explanatory work. Devitt then argues that, if there are any problems for the nominalists in this ballpark, these have to do with the need to provide translations of our talk about the properties of properties to a language that does not require the existence of universals.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Michael Devitt’s recent book Putting Metaphysics First collects together fifteen of his previously published articles on metaphysics and epistemology. I will first explain the basic crux of these articles, then give high praise for the volume, and finally raise a concern about his way of distinguishing antirealist views from realism in a given domain. The first chapter argues against David Armstrong’s realism about universals. It first explains why the One over Many argument is a pseudo-problem. Besides a basic story about how a given predicate ‘F’ can apply to many F things, no further explanation is needed for why objects a and b are F, and therefore no universals are needed to do explanatory work. Devitt then argues that, if there are any problems for the nominalists in this ballpark, these have to do with the need to provide translations of our talk about the properties of properties to a language that does not require the existence of universals.

Key concepts: Metaphysics, Philosophy, Problem of universals, Epistemology, Praise, Realism, Predicate (mathematical logic), Philosophy of language

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Putting Metaphysics First: Essays on Metaphysics and Epistemology, by Michael Devitt — Research Paper | ScholarLens