1958Experimental Biology and MedicineRequires access

Antibody Response to Asian Influenza Vaccination in Man.

W. Pelon, W. J. Mogabgab, Lawrence F. Dietlein, G.E. Burch, B. Holmes

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

The route of administration, either intradermal, subcutaneous, or intramuscular, did not significantly affect the antibody response following Asian influenza vaccination. Antibody titers produced were proportional to the total amount of vaccine inoculated whether given as a single dose or divided into 2 injections separated by an interval of 3 weeks. Hemagglutination-inhibition antibody titers in post-vaccinal sera were greater when determined with the TC and EFME lines of Asian virus than with early or later passages of the straight E line. Neutralization titers with the TC line in monkey cultures were considerably greater than those determined with the E lines in the allantoic sac. The geometric mean hemagglutination-inhibition antibody titer of a large group of postinfluenzal sera was used as the baseline for evaluation of antibody response to vaccine by using the same virus line and method of in-activation of non-specific inhibitor in sera in both cases.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The route of administration, either intradermal, subcutaneous, or intramuscular, did not significantly affect the antibody response following Asian influenza vaccination. Antibody titers produced were proportional to the total amount of vaccine inoculated whether given as a single dose or divided into 2 injections separated by an interval of 3 weeks. Hemagglutination-inhibition antibody titers in post-vaccinal sera were greater when determined with the TC and EFME lines of Asian virus than with early or later passages of the straight E line. Neutralization titers with the TC line in monkey cultures were considerably greater than those determined with the E lines in the allantoic sac. The geometric mean hemagglutination-inhibition antibody titer of a large group of postinfluenzal sera was used as the baseline for evaluation of antibody response to vaccine by using the same virus line and method of in-activation of non-specific inhibitor in sera in both cases.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The route of administration, either intradermal, subcutaneous, or intramuscular, did not significantly affect the antibody response following Asian influenza vaccination. Antibody titers produced were proportional to the total amount of vaccine inoculated whether given as a single dose or divided into 2 injections separated by an interval of 3 weeks. Hemagglutination-inhibition antibody titers in post-vaccinal sera were greater when determined with the TC and EFME lines of Asian virus than with early or later passages of the straight E line. Neutralization titers with the TC line in monkey cultures were considerably greater than those determined with the E lines in the allantoic sac. The geometric mean hemagglutination-inhibition antibody titer of a large group of postinfluenzal sera was used as the baseline for evaluation of antibody response to vaccine by using the same virus line and method of in-activation of non-specific inhibitor in sera in both cases.

Key concepts: Titer, Virology, Hemagglutination assay, Antibody, Antibody titer, Hemagglutination, Vaccination, Virus

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Antibody Response to Asian Influenza Vaccination in Man. — Research Paper | ScholarLens