1974British Journal of SociologyRequires access

Academic Freedom and Higher Education in England

Marilyn Harrison, Keith Weightman

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

As an object of sociological inquiry academic freedom, we suggest, must be distinguished from philosophical discussions of freedom itself. Ben-David and Collinsl have observed that 'objective academic freedom is a myth, since there are always some people who authoritatively define what its limits are'. Academic freedom does not therefore mean freedom from social expectations but exposure to expectations which have certain distinctive characteristics. First, the expectations apply only to individuals who occupy certain positions; in short, they constitute a role. Second, and unlike many role expectations, the demands are not for conformity and acceptance, but for rigorous scrutiny and criticism. Arnold Rose2 refers to the fashion designer and the scientist as examples of such roles and no doubt a niche somewhere between the two can be found for most academics:

About this research paper

What this paper is about

As an object of sociological inquiry academic freedom, we suggest, must be distinguished from philosophical discussions of freedom itself. Ben-David and Collinsl have observed that 'objective academic freedom is a myth, since there are always some people who authoritatively define what its limits are'. Academic freedom does not therefore mean freedom from social expectations but exposure to expectations which have certain distinctive characteristics. First, the expectations apply only to individuals who occupy certain positions; in short, they constitute a role. Second, and unlike many role expectations, the demands are not for conformity and acceptance, but for rigorous scrutiny and criticism. Arnold Rose2 refers to the fashion designer and the scientist as examples of such roles and no doubt a niche somewhere between the two can be found for most academics:

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

As an object of sociological inquiry academic freedom, we suggest, must be distinguished from philosophical discussions of freedom itself. Ben-David and Collinsl have observed that 'objective academic freedom is a myth, since there are always some people who authoritatively define what its limits are'. Academic freedom does not therefore mean freedom from social expectations but exposure to expectations which have certain distinctive characteristics. First, the expectations apply only to individuals who occupy certain positions; in short, they constitute a role. Second, and unlike many role expectations, the demands are not for conformity and acceptance, but for rigorous scrutiny and criticism. Arnold Rose2 refers to the fashion designer and the scientist as examples of such roles and no doubt a niche somewhere between the two can be found for most academics:

Key concepts: Academic freedom, Higher education, Political science, Sociology, Media studies, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Academic Freedom and Higher Education in England — Research Paper | ScholarLens