1994American Journal of Clinical PathologyRequires access

The Differential Diagnosis of Prostatic Carcinoma:Its Distinction from Premalignant and Pseudocarcinomatous Lesions of the Prostate Gland

Edward C. Jones, Robert H. Young

Open publisher page 45 citations

Abstract

Prostate gland specimens account for a significant percentage of diagnostically challenging cases in surgical pathology practice. The understanding of prostate pathology has progressed, and the differential diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma has expanded to include possible premalignant lesions and several recently described pseudocarcinomatous lesions. The authors discuss the histopathology of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical adenomatous hyperplasia, review the evidence for their role as premalignant lesions, and discuss the criteria that allow for their distinction from prostatic adenocarcinoma. Pseudocarcinomatous lesions that must be recognized when assessing prostatic tissue include sclerosing adenosis, cribriform hyperplasia, mesonephric hyperplasia, and basal cell hyperplasia. The pathologic features and diagnostic challenges of these and other pseudocarcinomatous lesions are reviewed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Prostate gland specimens account for a significant percentage of diagnostically challenging cases in surgical pathology practice. The understanding of prostate pathology has progressed, and the differential diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma has expanded to include possible premalignant lesions and several recently described pseudocarcinomatous lesions. The authors discuss the histopathology of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical adenomatous hyperplasia, review the evidence for their role as premalignant lesions, and discuss the criteria that allow for their distinction from prostatic adenocarcinoma. Pseudocarcinomatous lesions that must be recognized when assessing prostatic tissue include sclerosing adenosis, cribriform hyperplasia, mesonephric hyperplasia, and basal cell hyperplasia. The pathologic features and diagnostic challenges of these and other pseudocarcinomatous lesions are reviewed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 45 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Prostate gland specimens account for a significant percentage of diagnostically challenging cases in surgical pathology practice. The understanding of prostate pathology has progressed, and the differential diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma has expanded to include possible premalignant lesions and several recently described pseudocarcinomatous lesions. The authors discuss the histopathology of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical adenomatous hyperplasia, review the evidence for their role as premalignant lesions, and discuss the criteria that allow for their distinction from prostatic adenocarcinoma. Pseudocarcinomatous lesions that must be recognized when assessing prostatic tissue include sclerosing adenosis, cribriform hyperplasia, mesonephric hyperplasia, and basal cell hyperplasia. The pathologic features and diagnostic challenges of these and other pseudocarcinomatous lesions are reviewed.

Key concepts: Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia, Hyperplasia, Intraepithelial neoplasia, Pathology, Medicine, Prostate, Differential diagnosis, Carcinoma

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Differential Diagnosis of Prostatic Carcinoma:Its Distinction from Premalignant and Pseudocarcinomatous Lesions of the Prostate Gland — Research Paper | ScholarLens