2000PubMedRequires access

Nuclear volume estimates in prostatic atypical adenomatous hyperplasia.

Antonio López-Beltrán, Emilio Artacho‐Pérula, Rafael J. Luque, R Roldán-Villalobos

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate nuclear volume estimates by the point-sampled intercepts method in atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) as compared with nodular hyperplasia and well-differentiated prostatic adenocarcinoma. STUDY DESIGN: The study group consisted of 27 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, whole-mounted radical prostatectomy specimens that contained foci of nodular hyperplasia, atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and well-differentiated adenocarcinoma (Gleason pattern 1 and 2). Representative sections were selected for stereologic estimation of volume-weighted mean nuclear volume by the point-sampled intercepts method. On each focus, an average of five fields of vision were systematically chosen. RESULTS: The quantitative results indicate an increase in nuclear volume from nodular hyperplasia (209 +/- 65 micron 3) to AAH (237 +/- 85 micron 3) and prostate adenocarcinoma (436 +/- 106 micron 3). Significant differences were found (F = 39.0, P < .001) with two group comparisons (Scheffe's procedure) between prostate cancer and AAH (P < .001) or nodular hyperplasia (P < .001). The difference between AAH and benign hyperplasia was not signifcant. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that three-dimensional estimates of the nuclear size discriminate AAH and nodular hyperplasia from well-differentiated prostate adenocarcinoma. These findings suggest that AAH is probably a histologic variant of benign prostatic hyperplasia the exact relationship of which to prostatic adenocarcinoma remains to be determined.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To investigate nuclear volume estimates by the point-sampled intercepts method in atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) as compared with nodular hyperplasia and well-differentiated prostatic adenocarcinoma. STUDY DESIGN: The study group consisted of 27 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, whole-mounted radical prostatectomy specimens that contained foci of nodular hyperplasia, atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and well-differentiated adenocarcinoma (Gleason pattern 1 and 2). Representative sections were selected for stereologic estimation of volume-weighted mean nuclear volume by the point-sampled intercepts method. On each focus, an average of five fields of vision were systematically chosen. RESULTS: The quantitative results indicate an increase in nuclear volume from nodular hyperplasia (209 +/- 65 micron 3) to AAH (237 +/- 85 micron 3) and prostate adenocarcinoma (436 +/- 106 micron 3). Significant differences were found (F = 39.0, P < .001) with two group comparisons (Scheffe's procedure) between prostate cancer and AAH (P < .001) or nodular hyperplasia (P < .001). The difference between AAH and benign hyperplasia was not signifcant. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that three-dimensional estimates of the nuclear size discriminate AAH and nodular hyperplasia from well-differentiated prostate adenocarcinoma. These findings suggest that AAH is probably a histologic variant of benign prostatic hyperplasia the exact relationship of which to prostatic adenocarcinoma remains to be determined.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate nuclear volume estimates by the point-sampled intercepts method in atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) as compared with nodular hyperplasia and well-differentiated prostatic adenocarcinoma. STUDY DESIGN: The study group consisted of 27 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, whole-mounted radical prostatectomy specimens that contained foci of nodular hyperplasia, atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and well-differentiated adenocarcinoma (Gleason pattern 1 and 2). Representative sections were selected for stereologic estimation of volume-weighted mean nuclear volume by the point-sampled intercepts method. On each focus, an average of five fields of vision were systematically chosen. RESULTS: The quantitative results indicate an increase in nuclear volume from nodular hyperplasia (209 +/- 65 micron 3) to AAH (237 +/- 85 micron 3) and prostate adenocarcinoma (436 +/- 106 micron 3). Significant differences were found (F = 39.0, P < .001) with two group comparisons (Scheffe's procedure) between prostate cancer and AAH (P < .001) or nodular hyperplasia (P < .001). The difference between AAH and benign hyperplasia was not signifcant. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that three-dimensional estimates of the nuclear size discriminate AAH and nodular hyperplasia from well-differentiated prostate adenocarcinoma. These findings suggest that AAH is probably a histologic variant of benign prostatic hyperplasia the exact relationship of which to prostatic adenocarcinoma remains to be determined.

Key concepts: Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia, Hyperplasia, Adenocarcinoma, Pathology, Medicine, Prostate, Prostatectomy, Urology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Nuclear volume estimates in prostatic atypical adenomatous hyperplasia. — Research Paper | ScholarLens