2013American Journal of Health BehaviorRequires access

Providers Role in Colonoscopy Screening for Colorectal Cancer

Prakash Ramdass, Paul Petraro, Christina Via, Armin Shahrokni, Haq Nawaz

Open publisher page 27 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine predictors of provider recommendations for colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: We examined proportions of patients without prior screening for colonoscopy and their willingness to get a colonoscopy if recommended by a healthcare provider. RESULTS: The rate of CRC screening with a colonoscopy within the recommended guidelines was 35%; provider recommendation rate for colonoscopy screening was 34.9%; and never-screened patients would receive a colonoscopy 78% when recommended by a provider. Provider recommendation was the best predictor for receiving a screening colonoscopy (OR 4.19; 95% CI, 1.91-9.22, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Physician recommendation for colonoscopy is the most effective strategy to promote screening colonoscopy in the US, but only one third of eligible patients recall such counseling.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVES: To examine predictors of provider recommendations for colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: We examined proportions of patients without prior screening for colonoscopy and their willingness to get a colonoscopy if recommended by a healthcare provider. RESULTS: The rate of CRC screening with a colonoscopy within the recommended guidelines was 35%; provider recommendation rate for colonoscopy screening was 34.9%; and never-screened patients would receive a colonoscopy 78% when recommended by a provider. Provider recommendation was the best predictor for receiving a screening colonoscopy (OR 4.19; 95% CI, 1.91-9.22, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Physician recommendation for colonoscopy is the most effective strategy to promote screening colonoscopy in the US, but only one third of eligible patients recall such counseling.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 27 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine predictors of provider recommendations for colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: We examined proportions of patients without prior screening for colonoscopy and their willingness to get a colonoscopy if recommended by a healthcare provider. RESULTS: The rate of CRC screening with a colonoscopy within the recommended guidelines was 35%; provider recommendation rate for colonoscopy screening was 34.9%; and never-screened patients would receive a colonoscopy 78% when recommended by a provider. Provider recommendation was the best predictor for receiving a screening colonoscopy (OR 4.19; 95% CI, 1.91-9.22, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Physician recommendation for colonoscopy is the most effective strategy to promote screening colonoscopy in the US, but only one third of eligible patients recall such counseling.

Key concepts: Colonoscopy, Medicine, Colorectal cancer screening, Colorectal cancer, Health care, Internal medicine, Family medicine, Cancer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Providers Role in Colonoscopy Screening for Colorectal Cancer — Research Paper | ScholarLens