ScholarLens Back to search
1999•Academy of Management ProceedingsRequires access

CLOAKED CULTURE AND VEILED DIVERSITY: WHY THEORISTS IGNORED EARLY U.S. WORKFORCE DIVERSITY.

Lois Landis Kurowski

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This paper examines four questions: Was the U.S. workforce diverse in previous times? What were the origins of its diversity? How did management scholars of the past view the diversity of the U.S. workforce? Why did they view diversity as they did? While the workforce was diverse, particularly in the era 1880-1930, the diversity was addressed exclusively in practitioner literature, not in theoretical literature. Five intellectual trends contributed to the

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper examines four questions: Was the U.S. workforce diverse in previous times? What were the origins of its diversity? How did management scholars of the past view the diversity of the U.S. workforce? Why did they view diversity as they did? While the workforce was diverse, particularly in the era 1880-1930, the diversity was addressed exclusively in practitioner literature, not in theoretical literature. Five intellectual trends contributed to the

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper examines four questions: Was the U.S. workforce diverse in previous times? What were the origins of its diversity? How did management scholars of the past view the diversity of the U.S. workforce? Why did they view diversity as they did? While the workforce was diverse, particularly in the era 1880-1930, the diversity was addressed exclusively in practitioner literature, not in theoretical literature. Five intellectual trends contributed to the

Key concepts: Diversity (politics), Workforce, Workforce diversity, Sociology, Cultural diversity, Political science, Social science, Public relations

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
CLOAKED CULTURE AND VEILED DIVERSITY: WHY THEORISTS IGNORED EARLY U.S. WORKFORCE DIVERSITY. — Research Paper | ScholarLens