1995The Annual review of sociologyOpen access

Action and Structure in Structurationism

Hiroshi Tanabe

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The concept of “structure” is regularly used in Durkheimian fashion, yet sociologists' use of the term is often vague and ambiguous. Seen as external to social actors, it appears as a constraint upon action. In contrast to this view, Anthony Giddens insisted that structure is not to be equated with constraint but is always both enabling and constraining.Many critics, however, aver that Giddens does not deal adequately with the question of structural constraint.This paper is an attempt to examine whether or not such criticism is apt. Through that examination a weak point in Giddens' structuration theory will be pointed out.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The concept of “structure” is regularly used in Durkheimian fashion, yet sociologists' use of the term is often vague and ambiguous. Seen as external to social actors, it appears as a constraint upon action. In contrast to this view, Anthony Giddens insisted that structure is not to be equated with constraint but is always both enabling and constraining.Many critics, however, aver that Giddens does not deal adequately with the question of structural constraint.This paper is an attempt to examine whether or not such criticism is apt. Through that examination a weak point in Giddens' structuration theory will be pointed out.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The concept of “structure” is regularly used in Durkheimian fashion, yet sociologists' use of the term is often vague and ambiguous. Seen as external to social actors, it appears as a constraint upon action. In contrast to this view, Anthony Giddens insisted that structure is not to be equated with constraint but is always both enabling and constraining.Many critics, however, aver that Giddens does not deal adequately with the question of structural constraint.This paper is an attempt to examine whether or not such criticism is apt. Through that examination a weak point in Giddens' structuration theory will be pointed out.

Key concepts: Constraint (computer-aided design), Epistemology, Action (physics), Criticism, Term (time), Sociology, Structuration theory, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Action and Structure in Structurationism — Research Paper | ScholarLens