2012The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical CareRequires access

A questionable association of stroke volume and arterial pulse pressure under gravitational stress

Anita T. Coté, Aaron A. Phillips, Shannon S. D. Bredin, Darren E. R. Warburton

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine individual stroke volume-pulse pressure (PP) relationships in healthy young men and women. METHODS: Sixteen healthy men and women were assessed at baseline and during four 12-minute stages of progressive lower body negative pressure (LBNP) at -15, -30, -45, and -60 mm Hg. RESULTS: Throughout staged LBNP, systolic blood pressure (105 ± 7.8 vs. 103 ± 8.3 mm Hg) and mean arterial pressure were not statistically different (81 ± 5.6 vs. 83 ± 5.9 mm Hg). There was also a significant increase in diastolic blood pressure (69 ± 5.3 vs. 72 ± 5.9 mm Hg) and heart rate (63 ± 8.3 vs. 86 ± 14.2 bpm) as well as a decrease in PP (37 ± 5.7 vs. 31 ± 7.0 mm Hg) and stroke volume (80 ± 17.0 vs. 26.6 ± 10.0 mL). There was a strong positive relationship for LBNP versus stroke volume (r2 = 0.99), PP (r2 = 0.96), and heart rate (r2 = -0.92), as well as for stroke volume versus PP (r2 = 0.98) and stroke volume versus heart rate (r = -0.94). Substantial intersubject variability in the stroke volume and PP correlations were presented. Strong, significant correlations were only displayed for 38% of the participants, while heart rate and stroke volume was strongly associated in 63% of these individuals. CONCLUSIONS: This work highlights the limitations of using PP when assessing trauma patients because of large interindividual differences.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine individual stroke volume-pulse pressure (PP) relationships in healthy young men and women. METHODS: Sixteen healthy men and women were assessed at baseline and during four 12-minute stages of progressive lower body negative pressure (LBNP) at -15, -30, -45, and -60 mm Hg. RESULTS: Throughout staged LBNP, systolic blood pressure (105 ± 7.8 vs. 103 ± 8.3 mm Hg) and mean arterial pressure were not statistically different (81 ± 5.6 vs. 83 ± 5.9 mm Hg). There was also a significant increase in diastolic blood pressure (69 ± 5.3 vs. 72 ± 5.9 mm Hg) and heart rate (63 ± 8.3 vs. 86 ± 14.2 bpm) as well as a decrease in PP (37 ± 5.7 vs. 31 ± 7.0 mm Hg) and stroke volume (80 ± 17.0 vs. 26.6 ± 10.0 mL). There was a strong positive relationship for LBNP versus stroke volume (r2 = 0.99), PP (r2 = 0.96), and heart rate (r2 = -0.92), as well as for stroke volume versus PP (r2 = 0.98) and stroke volume versus heart rate (r = -0.94). Substantial intersubject variability in the stroke volume and PP correlations were presented. Strong, significant correlations were only displayed for 38% of the participants, while heart rate and stroke volume was strongly associated in 63% of these individuals. CONCLUSIONS: This work highlights the limitations of using PP when assessing trauma patients because of large interindividual differences.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine individual stroke volume-pulse pressure (PP) relationships in healthy young men and women. METHODS: Sixteen healthy men and women were assessed at baseline and during four 12-minute stages of progressive lower body negative pressure (LBNP) at -15, -30, -45, and -60 mm Hg. RESULTS: Throughout staged LBNP, systolic blood pressure (105 ± 7.8 vs. 103 ± 8.3 mm Hg) and mean arterial pressure were not statistically different (81 ± 5.6 vs. 83 ± 5.9 mm Hg). There was also a significant increase in diastolic blood pressure (69 ± 5.3 vs. 72 ± 5.9 mm Hg) and heart rate (63 ± 8.3 vs. 86 ± 14.2 bpm) as well as a decrease in PP (37 ± 5.7 vs. 31 ± 7.0 mm Hg) and stroke volume (80 ± 17.0 vs. 26.6 ± 10.0 mL). There was a strong positive relationship for LBNP versus stroke volume (r2 = 0.99), PP (r2 = 0.96), and heart rate (r2 = -0.92), as well as for stroke volume versus PP (r2 = 0.98) and stroke volume versus heart rate (r = -0.94). Substantial intersubject variability in the stroke volume and PP correlations were presented. Strong, significant correlations were only displayed for 38% of the participants, while heart rate and stroke volume was strongly associated in 63% of these individuals. CONCLUSIONS: This work highlights the limitations of using PP when assessing trauma patients because of large interindividual differences.

Key concepts: Pulse pressure, Pulse (music), Volume (thermodynamics), Association (psychology), Stress (linguistics), Cardiology, Stroke (engine), Blood pressure

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A questionable association of stroke volume and arterial pulse pressure under gravitational stress — Research Paper | ScholarLens