1996International AffairsRequires access

The US-Japan car dispute: a monumental mistake

Jagdish N. Bhagwati

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

The author examines the recent trade dispute between the United States and Japan concerning the automobile industry as an illustration of the shortcomings of US trade policy under the Clinton administration, in respect of two main issues: aggressive unilateralism, and demands for managed trade in the form of ‘voluntary import expansions’. He argues both the US complaints against Japan were ill-founded and that the methods chosen by the US administration, and in particular by the US Trade Representative Mickey Kantor, to pursue them were politically misconceived, inconsistent with the United States’ declared allegiance to the multilateral trading system, and damaging both to that system and to US-Japan trade relations. The failure of the US strategy, he argues, is unsurprising and welcome, and US-Japan trade relations should now be normalized.⋆

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The author examines the recent trade dispute between the United States and Japan concerning the automobile industry as an illustration of the shortcomings of US trade policy under the Clinton administration, in respect of two main issues: aggressive unilateralism, and demands for managed trade in the form of ‘voluntary import expansions’. He argues both the US complaints against Japan were ill-founded and that the methods chosen by the US administration, and in particular by the US Trade Representative Mickey Kantor, to pursue them were politically misconceived, inconsistent with the United States’ declared allegiance to the multilateral trading system, and damaging both to that system and to US-Japan trade relations. The failure of the US strategy, he argues, is unsurprising and welcome, and US-Japan trade relations should now be normalized.⋆

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The author examines the recent trade dispute between the United States and Japan concerning the automobile industry as an illustration of the shortcomings of US trade policy under the Clinton administration, in respect of two main issues: aggressive unilateralism, and demands for managed trade in the form of ‘voluntary import expansions’. He argues both the US complaints against Japan were ill-founded and that the methods chosen by the US administration, and in particular by the US Trade Representative Mickey Kantor, to pursue them were politically misconceived, inconsistent with the United States’ declared allegiance to the multilateral trading system, and damaging both to that system and to US-Japan trade relations. The failure of the US strategy, he argues, is unsurprising and welcome, and US-Japan trade relations should now be normalized.⋆

Key concepts: Unilateralism, Allegiance, Administration (probate law), Mistake, International trade, Political science, Free trade, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The US-Japan car dispute: a monumental mistake — Research Paper | ScholarLens