Unilateralism in theory and practice
Manfred Bertele, Holger H. Mey
Abstract
Manfred Bertele, Holger H. Mey
Abstract
This article takes a pragmatic approach to unilateralism in international relations, first, by examining its possibilities and limits and, second, by assessing how unilateralism can deal with future challenges in the international system. Unilateralism in the sense of complete freedom of action without commitment to compromise or cooperation is largely counterproductive. The key question is, What is the mix of unilateral and multilateral elements that a given state chooses? Conditions of the international environment at the end of the twentieth century make even the most powerful state increasingly reliant on multilateral forms of action.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This article takes a pragmatic approach to unilateralism in international relations, first, by examining its possibilities and limits and, second, by assessing how unilateralism can deal with future challenges in the international system. Unilateralism in the sense of complete freedom of action without commitment to compromise or cooperation is largely counterproductive. The key question is, What is the mix of unilateral and multilateral elements that a given state chooses? Conditions of the international environment at the end of the twentieth century make even the most powerful state increasingly reliant on multilateral forms of action.
Key concepts: Unilateralism, Compromise, Action (physics), Political science, State (computer science), Law and economics, Key (lock), Sociology