2010•Unpublished venueRequires access

Multidisciplinarity and specificity in scientific publication: discussion of the impact when assessing

Rogério Mugnaini, Dinah Apparecida de Melo, Aguiar Población

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The bibliographic references may reveal how science is being published, and thus provide important information regarding the history of any magazine. When identifying the impact of different types of documents cited by five scientific journals of different fields, it was found that the book has considerably been more quoted in a particular magazine of Applied Social Sciences; meanwhile, the Public Health field makes use of this type of document about as much as it does with scientific articles. In journals of Physics and Medicine, citations from international journals are much more prevalent. As for journals in the field of Veterinary and Information Science, proceedings and dissertations stand out. These findings are important to understand how the scientific publication of different fields work. And that could also be observed when analyzing both the ratings of the journals in Qualis, and the criteria of existing field documents. Bibliometric indicators that are not restricted to an index are able to provide parameters to cooperate in establishing criteria for the assessment of scientific production in Brazil, according to the characteristics of different fields of knowledge.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The bibliographic references may reveal how science is being published, and thus provide important information regarding the history of any magazine. When identifying the impact of different types of documents cited by five scientific journals of different fields, it was found that the book has considerably been more quoted in a particular magazine of Applied Social Sciences; meanwhile, the Public Health field makes use of this type of document about as much as it does with scientific articles. In journals of Physics and Medicine, citations from international journals are much more prevalent. As for journals in the field of Veterinary and Information Science, proceedings and dissertations stand out. These findings are important to understand how the scientific publication of different fields work. And that could also be observed when analyzing both the ratings of the journals in Qualis, and the criteria of existing field documents. Bibliometric indicators that are not restricted to an index are able to provide parameters to cooperate in establishing criteria for the assessment of scientific production in Brazil, according to the characteristics of different fields of knowledge.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The bibliographic references may reveal how science is being published, and thus provide important information regarding the history of any magazine. When identifying the impact of different types of documents cited by five scientific journals of different fields, it was found that the book has considerably been more quoted in a particular magazine of Applied Social Sciences; meanwhile, the Public Health field makes use of this type of document about as much as it does with scientific articles. In journals of Physics and Medicine, citations from international journals are much more prevalent. As for journals in the field of Veterinary and Information Science, proceedings and dissertations stand out. These findings are important to understand how the scientific publication of different fields work. And that could also be observed when analyzing both the ratings of the journals in Qualis, and the criteria of existing field documents. Bibliometric indicators that are not restricted to an index are able to provide parameters to cooperate in establishing criteria for the assessment of scientific production in Brazil, according to the characteristics of different fields of knowledge.

Key concepts: Multidisciplinary approach, Field (mathematics), Bibliometrics, Library science, Scientific literature, Index (typography), Scientometrics, Work (physics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Multidisciplinarity and specificity in scientific publication: discussion of the impact when assessing — Research Paper | ScholarLens