2010PubMedRequires access

[Clinical evaluation of the ICare tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure].

Patrycjia Krzyzanowska-Berkowska, Magdalena Asejczyk

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the intraocular pressure (P), values obtained with the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), and to evaluate the influence of central comeal thickness (CCT), and radius of the corneal curvature (R) on IOP measurements. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty four eyes of 48 subjects (65 eyes of glaucoma patients and 19 eyes of healthy volunteers), were examined with ICare and Goldmann tonometers. Central corneal thickness was determined by ultrasound pachymetry. Corneal radius of curvature was determined using corneal topography. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between IOP readings with ICare and GAT. Intraocular pressure measurements were found to be higher with the ICare tonometer, both in glaucoma patients (15.3 +/- 4.0 mmHg, and normal subjects (14.4 +/- 3.0 mmHg). ICare-GAT mean difference was 1.1 +/- 3.6 mmHg (95% CI, -6.1-8.3 mmHg), for glaucoma patients and 1.8 +/- 3.2 mmHg (95% CI, -4.6-8.2 mmHg), for healthy volunteers. Using CCT patients were divided into 2 groups: (1) thinnest corneas--CCT < or =556 microm and (2) thickest coneas--CCT >556 microm. In the group of thinnest comeas there was no correlation between IOP (CCT and R. In thickest corneas there was significant correlation between IOP readings obtained by ICare and CCT (r = -0.4, p < 0.01), and mean radius (R) (r = 0.5, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of IOP using the ICare rebound tonometer are in good agreement with Goldmann applanation tonometer, although influenced by CCT

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: To compare the intraocular pressure (P), values obtained with the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), and to evaluate the influence of central comeal thickness (CCT), and radius of the corneal curvature (R) on IOP measurements. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty four eyes of 48 subjects (65 eyes of glaucoma patients and 19 eyes of healthy volunteers), were examined with ICare and Goldmann tonometers. Central corneal thickness was determined by ultrasound pachymetry. Corneal radius of curvature was determined using corneal topography. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between IOP readings with ICare and GAT. Intraocular pressure measurements were found to be higher with the ICare tonometer, both in glaucoma patients (15.3 +/- 4.0 mmHg, and normal subjects (14.4 +/- 3.0 mmHg). ICare-GAT mean difference was 1.1 +/- 3.6 mmHg (95% CI, -6.1-8.3 mmHg), for glaucoma patients and 1.8 +/- 3.2 mmHg (95% CI, -4.6-8.2 mmHg), for healthy volunteers. Using CCT patients were divided into 2 groups: (1) thinnest corneas--CCT < or =556 microm and (2) thickest coneas--CCT >556 microm. In the group of thinnest comeas there was no correlation between IOP (CCT and R. In thickest corneas there was significant correlation between IOP readings obtained by ICare and CCT (r = -0.4, p < 0.01), and mean radius (R) (r = 0.5, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of IOP using the ICare rebound tonometer are in good agreement with Goldmann applanation tonometer, although influenced by CCT

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the intraocular pressure (P), values obtained with the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), and to evaluate the influence of central comeal thickness (CCT), and radius of the corneal curvature (R) on IOP measurements. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty four eyes of 48 subjects (65 eyes of glaucoma patients and 19 eyes of healthy volunteers), were examined with ICare and Goldmann tonometers. Central corneal thickness was determined by ultrasound pachymetry. Corneal radius of curvature was determined using corneal topography. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between IOP readings with ICare and GAT. Intraocular pressure measurements were found to be higher with the ICare tonometer, both in glaucoma patients (15.3 +/- 4.0 mmHg, and normal subjects (14.4 +/- 3.0 mmHg). ICare-GAT mean difference was 1.1 +/- 3.6 mmHg (95% CI, -6.1-8.3 mmHg), for glaucoma patients and 1.8 +/- 3.2 mmHg (95% CI, -4.6-8.2 mmHg), for healthy volunteers. Using CCT patients were divided into 2 groups: (1) thinnest corneas--CCT < or =556 microm and (2) thickest coneas--CCT >556 microm. In the group of thinnest comeas there was no correlation between IOP (CCT and R. In thickest corneas there was significant correlation between IOP readings obtained by ICare and CCT (r = -0.4, p < 0.01), and mean radius (R) (r = 0.5, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of IOP using the ICare rebound tonometer are in good agreement with Goldmann applanation tonometer, although influenced by CCT

Key concepts: Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Medicine, Intraocular pressure, Ophthalmology, Glaucoma, Applanation tonometry, Significant difference, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Clinical evaluation of the ICare tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens