1999•Journal of Entomological ResearchRequires access

Field screening of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes against gram pod borer (Heliothis armigera Hub.) under late sown conditions

Brijesh Singh, Renu Yadav

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Seventy desi chickpea genotypes were subjected to field screening against Heliothis armigera Hub. under late sown conditions i.e., sown on or after 16th December. None of these genotypes showed complete resistance to the pest or could evade its infestation. On the basis of all the three parameters for evaluation i.e., relative pest pressure index, relative intensity of damage index and relative productivity index; chickpea genotypes, viz, DHG 84–11, ICC 29, DHG 86–38, DHG 88–20, SG 90–55, KBG1, IH 83–83, NP 37, DHG 87–54, GNG 669 and SG 89–11 were identified as either more pest tolerant or as good as common cultivars, viz., P 240, P 256, C 235 and BR 77, belonging to phenologically four different groups. The remaining genotypes proved inferior to their checks.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Seventy desi chickpea genotypes were subjected to field screening against Heliothis armigera Hub. under late sown conditions i.e., sown on or after 16th December. None of these genotypes showed complete resistance to the pest or could evade its infestation. On the basis of all the three parameters for evaluation i.e., relative pest pressure index, relative intensity of damage index and relative productivity index; chickpea genotypes, viz, DHG 84–11, ICC 29, DHG 86–38, DHG 88–20, SG 90–55, KBG1, IH 83–83, NP 37, DHG 87–54, GNG 669 and SG 89–11 were identified as either more pest tolerant or as good as common cultivars, viz., P 240, P 256, C 235 and BR 77, belonging to phenologically four different groups. The remaining genotypes proved inferior to their checks.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Seventy desi chickpea genotypes were subjected to field screening against Heliothis armigera Hub. under late sown conditions i.e., sown on or after 16th December. None of these genotypes showed complete resistance to the pest or could evade its infestation. On the basis of all the three parameters for evaluation i.e., relative pest pressure index, relative intensity of damage index and relative productivity index; chickpea genotypes, viz, DHG 84–11, ICC 29, DHG 86–38, DHG 88–20, SG 90–55, KBG1, IH 83–83, NP 37, DHG 87–54, GNG 669 and SG 89–11 were identified as either more pest tolerant or as good as common cultivars, viz., P 240, P 256, C 235 and BR 77, belonging to phenologically four different groups. The remaining genotypes proved inferior to their checks.

Key concepts: Infestation, PEST analysis, Gram, Veterinary medicine, Forensic science, Point of delivery, Cultivar, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Field screening of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes against gram pod borer (Heliothis armigera Hub.) under late sown conditions — Research Paper | ScholarLens