2009The FASEB JournalRequires access

Nutrient Rich Food Index categorization of foods aligns with nutrient content claim criteria

Victor L. Fulgoni, Debra Rose Keast, Adam Drewnowski

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The Nutrient Rich Food Index is calculated as the sum of the Daily Values (DV) of nine nutrients to encourage (protein; fiber; vitamins A, C, and E; Ca; Mg; Fe; K) minus the sum of the DV of three nutrients to limit (saturated fat, Na, and added sugars DV=50) per 100 calories. Using USDA's Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies we calculated the NRF index for all calorie‐containing foods consumed in NHANES 1999‐2002 and developed a five point scale (1=low/5= high) after standardizing scores within and across USDA defined food groups. We then determined the number of foods that met the following US FDA labeling standards: 1) % of foods that were a) a "good source" (GS) and b) an "excellent source" (ES) of nutrients with a DV; and 2) % of foods that met the definition of "healthy" (Hy). Over 92% of category 5 foods (high NRF score) had one or more nutrients at a GS level; about 82% of category 5 foods had one or more nutrients at an ES level, and over 60% of category five foods qualify for FDA Hy. In Category 3 (mid‐point NRF scores), 87, 65, and 22% of foods met the GS, ES, and Hy criteria, respectively. A little over 60% of category 1 foods (low NRF scores) had one or more nutrients at a GS level, about 30% of category 1 foods had one or more nutrients at an ES level, and less than 7% of category 1 foods met Hy. We conclude that the NRF index categories can distinguish between foods based on several definitions of FDA labeling criteria, especially for those foods meeting the definition of healthy. Supported by the National Dairy Council.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Nutrient Rich Food Index is calculated as the sum of the Daily Values (DV) of nine nutrients to encourage (protein; fiber; vitamins A, C, and E; Ca; Mg; Fe; K) minus the sum of the DV of three nutrients to limit (saturated fat, Na, and added sugars DV=50) per 100 calories. Using USDA's Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies we calculated the NRF index for all calorie‐containing foods consumed in NHANES 1999‐2002 and developed a five point scale (1=low/5= high) after standardizing scores within and across USDA defined food groups. We then determined the number of foods that met the following US FDA labeling standards: 1) % of foods that were a) a "good source" (GS) and b) an "excellent source" (ES) of nutrients with a DV; and 2) % of foods that met the definition of "healthy" (Hy). Over 92% of category 5 foods (high NRF score) had one or more nutrients at a GS level; about 82% of category 5 foods had one or more nutrients at an ES level, and over 60% of category five foods qualify for FDA Hy. In Category 3 (mid‐point NRF scores), 87, 65, and 22% of foods met the GS, ES, and Hy criteria, respectively. A little over 60% of category 1 foods (low NRF scores) had one or more nutrients at a GS level, about 30% of category 1 foods had one or more nutrients at an ES level, and less than 7% of category 1 foods met Hy. We conclude that the NRF index categories can distinguish between foods based on several definitions of FDA labeling criteria, especially for those foods meeting the definition of healthy. Supported by the National Dairy Council.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Nutrient Rich Food Index is calculated as the sum of the Daily Values (DV) of nine nutrients to encourage (protein; fiber; vitamins A, C, and E; Ca; Mg; Fe; K) minus the sum of the DV of three nutrients to limit (saturated fat, Na, and added sugars DV=50) per 100 calories. Using USDA's Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies we calculated the NRF index for all calorie‐containing foods consumed in NHANES 1999‐2002 and developed a five point scale (1=low/5= high) after standardizing scores within and across USDA defined food groups. We then determined the number of foods that met the following US FDA labeling standards: 1) % of foods that were a) a "good source" (GS) and b) an "excellent source" (ES) of nutrients with a DV; and 2) % of foods that met the definition of "healthy" (Hy). Over 92% of category 5 foods (high NRF score) had one or more nutrients at a GS level; about 82% of category 5 foods had one or more nutrients at an ES level, and over 60% of category five foods qualify for FDA Hy. In Category 3 (mid‐point NRF scores), 87, 65, and 22% of foods met the GS, ES, and Hy criteria, respectively. A little over 60% of category 1 foods (low NRF scores) had one or more nutrients at a GS level, about 30% of category 1 foods had one or more nutrients at an ES level, and less than 7% of category 1 foods met Hy. We conclude that the NRF index categories can distinguish between foods based on several definitions of FDA labeling criteria, especially for those foods meeting the definition of healthy. Supported by the National Dairy Council.

Key concepts: Nutrient, Calorie, Food science, Food group, Food composition data, Nutrient density, Nutrition facts label, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Nutrient Rich Food Index categorization of foods aligns with nutrient content claim criteria — Research Paper | ScholarLens