2007The FASEB JournalRequires access

What is an affordable nutritious food? Applications of the nutrient density score across and within food groups

Matthieu Maillot, Nicole Darmon, Michel Darmon, Adam Drewnowski

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The 2005 Dietary Guidelines suggest that consumers replace some of the foods in their diet with more nutrient dense options. The positive association between higher diet quality and elevated cost of dietary energy may also exist within food groups. Based on foods consumed by 1,332 adults in the French national food consumption survey, we calculated cost of energy, nutrient density and excess of problematic nutrients for 7 major food groups and 27 food subgroups. As a group, meat and fish and vegetables and fruit had the highest nutrient density scores but were the most expensive sources of energy. Grains provided low cost energy and were free of problematic nutrients. Added sugars, added fats, and foods high in fat, sugar, and salt, provided dietary energy at the lowest cost, but had the lowest nutrient density scores. Rather than prioritize nutrient dense foods within each food group, study participants tended to select the lower cost foods, even though those foods had a lower nutrient density. These data confirm that a nutrient density gradient does exist within food groups, underscoring the need for nutritional profiling of individual food items. The inclusion of food costs and the nutrient‐to‐price ratio permits a determination of how a nutrient dense diet can be obtained at an affordable cost. Support: French NRA & INPES, USDA CSREES 2004‐35215‐14441, National Cattlemen's Beef Association & Dairy Management, Inc.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The 2005 Dietary Guidelines suggest that consumers replace some of the foods in their diet with more nutrient dense options. The positive association between higher diet quality and elevated cost of dietary energy may also exist within food groups. Based on foods consumed by 1,332 adults in the French national food consumption survey, we calculated cost of energy, nutrient density and excess of problematic nutrients for 7 major food groups and 27 food subgroups. As a group, meat and fish and vegetables and fruit had the highest nutrient density scores but were the most expensive sources of energy. Grains provided low cost energy and were free of problematic nutrients. Added sugars, added fats, and foods high in fat, sugar, and salt, provided dietary energy at the lowest cost, but had the lowest nutrient density scores. Rather than prioritize nutrient dense foods within each food group, study participants tended to select the lower cost foods, even though those foods had a lower nutrient density. These data confirm that a nutrient density gradient does exist within food groups, underscoring the need for nutritional profiling of individual food items. The inclusion of food costs and the nutrient‐to‐price ratio permits a determination of how a nutrient dense diet can be obtained at an affordable cost. Support: French NRA & INPES, USDA CSREES 2004‐35215‐14441, National Cattlemen's Beef Association & Dairy Management, Inc.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The 2005 Dietary Guidelines suggest that consumers replace some of the foods in their diet with more nutrient dense options. The positive association between higher diet quality and elevated cost of dietary energy may also exist within food groups. Based on foods consumed by 1,332 adults in the French national food consumption survey, we calculated cost of energy, nutrient density and excess of problematic nutrients for 7 major food groups and 27 food subgroups. As a group, meat and fish and vegetables and fruit had the highest nutrient density scores but were the most expensive sources of energy. Grains provided low cost energy and were free of problematic nutrients. Added sugars, added fats, and foods high in fat, sugar, and salt, provided dietary energy at the lowest cost, but had the lowest nutrient density scores. Rather than prioritize nutrient dense foods within each food group, study participants tended to select the lower cost foods, even though those foods had a lower nutrient density. These data confirm that a nutrient density gradient does exist within food groups, underscoring the need for nutritional profiling of individual food items. The inclusion of food costs and the nutrient‐to‐price ratio permits a determination of how a nutrient dense diet can be obtained at an affordable cost. Support: French NRA & INPES, USDA CSREES 2004‐35215‐14441, National Cattlemen's Beef Association & Dairy Management, Inc.

Key concepts: Nutrient, Nutrient density, Food group, Energy density, Added sugar, Food science, Sugar, Environmental health

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
What is an affordable nutritious food? Applications of the nutrient density score across and within food groups — Research Paper | ScholarLens