2010•SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Transparency in Industrial Regulation

Laurence Tai

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Transparency, in the form of mandatory information disclosure, is thought to benefit the public interest in agency rulemaking because it makes regulatory policymaking more responsive to the public's policy preferences, as opposed to preferences of the industrial targets of regulation. This paper presents a formal model of rulemaking that suggests that the benefits of more information disclosure may be overstated. First, benefits are limited when the agency is allowed to publicize more information than it is required to by law. Second, forcing the agency to disclose any information it has may reduce the amount of information that is gathered in the policymaking process. The model results highlight costs to the public of increased transparency to be weighed against its more commonly acknowledged benefits.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Transparency, in the form of mandatory information disclosure, is thought to benefit the public interest in agency rulemaking because it makes regulatory policymaking more responsive to the public's policy preferences, as opposed to preferences of the industrial targets of regulation. This paper presents a formal model of rulemaking that suggests that the benefits of more information disclosure may be overstated. First, benefits are limited when the agency is allowed to publicize more information than it is required to by law. Second, forcing the agency to disclose any information it has may reduce the amount of information that is gathered in the policymaking process. The model results highlight costs to the public of increased transparency to be weighed against its more commonly acknowledged benefits.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Transparency, in the form of mandatory information disclosure, is thought to benefit the public interest in agency rulemaking because it makes regulatory policymaking more responsive to the public's policy preferences, as opposed to preferences of the industrial targets of regulation. This paper presents a formal model of rulemaking that suggests that the benefits of more information disclosure may be overstated. First, benefits are limited when the agency is allowed to publicize more information than it is required to by law. Second, forcing the agency to disclose any information it has may reduce the amount of information that is gathered in the policymaking process. The model results highlight costs to the public of increased transparency to be weighed against its more commonly acknowledged benefits.

Key concepts: Rulemaking, Transparency (behavior), Agency (philosophy), Business, Regulatory agency, Process (computing), Public information, Accounting

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Transparency in Industrial Regulation — Research Paper | ScholarLens