2013•SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Transparency and Power in Rulemaking (formerly Transparency in Industrial Regulation)

Laurence Tai

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This paper develops a model analyzing the impact of information transparency in administrative rulemaking. The key items of information are the regulated party's communication and the agent's signal based on that communication. Information disclosure not only allows the principal to observe the information, but it may also increase her power in the decision, measured by the probability that she can select the final policy. A key result is that, even without mandating any disclosures, the principal can have the same knowledge as the agent does about what level of regulation would be optimal. Instead of increasing knowledge, transparency primarily benefits the principal when it increases her power through the disclosures. However, it may also discourage the regulated party or agent from generating information in the first place. There are empirical implications to determine the model's applicability and institutional design implications to the extent it is applicable.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper develops a model analyzing the impact of information transparency in administrative rulemaking. The key items of information are the regulated party's communication and the agent's signal based on that communication. Information disclosure not only allows the principal to observe the information, but it may also increase her power in the decision, measured by the probability that she can select the final policy. A key result is that, even without mandating any disclosures, the principal can have the same knowledge as the agent does about what level of regulation would be optimal. Instead of increasing knowledge, transparency primarily benefits the principal when it increases her power through the disclosures. However, it may also discourage the regulated party or agent from generating information in the first place. There are empirical implications to determine the model's applicability and institutional design implications to the extent it is applicable.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper develops a model analyzing the impact of information transparency in administrative rulemaking. The key items of information are the regulated party's communication and the agent's signal based on that communication. Information disclosure not only allows the principal to observe the information, but it may also increase her power in the decision, measured by the probability that she can select the final policy. A key result is that, even without mandating any disclosures, the principal can have the same knowledge as the agent does about what level of regulation would be optimal. Instead of increasing knowledge, transparency primarily benefits the principal when it increases her power through the disclosures. However, it may also discourage the regulated party or agent from generating information in the first place. There are empirical implications to determine the model's applicability and institutional design implications to the extent it is applicable.

Key concepts: Rulemaking, Transparency (behavior), Principal (computer security), Business, Key (lock), Accounting, Power (physics), Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Transparency and Power in Rulemaking (formerly Transparency in Industrial Regulation) — Research Paper | ScholarLens