2015Basic Income StudiesRequires access

Piketty’s Capital , His Critics and Basic Income

Rubén M. Lo Vuolo

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Among other merits, Piketty’s book puts the topic of inequality and income/wealth concentration in the public agenda. His analysis concludes that aggregate income and wealth have tended to concentrate in the top few percentiles of the population. His research as well as the policy and political debate it has brought about, is relevant for the progress of the Basic Income movement. The tendencies for income and wealth concentration, the importance of inheritance for inequality, the weak foundations of current welfare state institutions, and the relevance of the tax structures for redistribution, all are central themes on the Basic Income debate. In this article, the author discusses certain aspects of Piketty’s Capital which are particularly relevant for the Basic Income debate. Taking into account some of the criticisms of Piketty’s work, the article discusses the importance of his main findings for the Basic Income debate.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Among other merits, Piketty’s book puts the topic of inequality and income/wealth concentration in the public agenda. His analysis concludes that aggregate income and wealth have tended to concentrate in the top few percentiles of the population. His research as well as the policy and political debate it has brought about, is relevant for the progress of the Basic Income movement. The tendencies for income and wealth concentration, the importance of inheritance for inequality, the weak foundations of current welfare state institutions, and the relevance of the tax structures for redistribution, all are central themes on the Basic Income debate. In this article, the author discusses certain aspects of Piketty’s Capital which are particularly relevant for the Basic Income debate. Taking into account some of the criticisms of Piketty’s work, the article discusses the importance of his main findings for the Basic Income debate.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Among other merits, Piketty’s book puts the topic of inequality and income/wealth concentration in the public agenda. His analysis concludes that aggregate income and wealth have tended to concentrate in the top few percentiles of the population. His research as well as the policy and political debate it has brought about, is relevant for the progress of the Basic Income movement. The tendencies for income and wealth concentration, the importance of inheritance for inequality, the weak foundations of current welfare state institutions, and the relevance of the tax structures for redistribution, all are central themes on the Basic Income debate. In this article, the author discusses certain aspects of Piketty’s Capital which are particularly relevant for the Basic Income debate. Taking into account some of the criticisms of Piketty’s work, the article discusses the importance of his main findings for the Basic Income debate.

Key concepts: Basic income, Redistribution of income and wealth, Economics, Economic inequality, Redistribution (election), Inequality, Capital income, Population

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Piketty’s Capital , His Critics and Basic Income — Research Paper | ScholarLens