2016Journal of Drug Delivery and TherapeuticsOpen access

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY TO EVALUATE THE ANTINOCICEPTIVE ACTIVITY OF FLUOXETINE AND ITS INTERACTION WITH NALOXONE AND ONDENSETRON IN MICE

Sachin Ambirwar, Amol Patil, Girish P. Joshi, Sudhir Pawar

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Objectives: Evaluate antinociceptive activity of fluoxetine and the interaction of fluoxetine with naloxone and ondansetron. Methods: 32 albino mice of either sex were divided into 4 groups of 8 mice each: group I received normal saline, group II received fluoxetine; group III received fluoxetine + naloxone; group IV received fluoxetine + ondansetron. Fluoxetine and naloxone were given subcutaneously whereas ondansetron was given intraperitoneally. Eddy’s hot plate analgesiometer was used. Latency of licking of paw or jumping from the hot plate was recorded at intervals after giving study drugs in each group. Results: Fluoxetine produced a significant increase in the latency of licking of paw or jumping as compared to control at all time intervals except at 120 minutes with onset of antinociceptive effect within 30 min (p<0.01) and maximum effect at 60 min time interval (p<0.001). There was no significant difference between the control group and the fluoxetine + naloxone or fluoxetine + ondansetron group at any time point. Pre-treatment with naloxone and ondansetron antagonized the antinociceptive effects of fluoxetine. Conclusion: Administration of naloxone and ondansetron in fluoxetine treated mice antagonized the antinociceptive activity of fluoxetine. Therefore, antinociceptive activity of fluoxetine may be mediated through µ-opiod and 5HT3 receptors. Keywords: anti-nociceptive, Eddy’s hot plate, fluoxetine, naloxone, ondansetron.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objectives: Evaluate antinociceptive activity of fluoxetine and the interaction of fluoxetine with naloxone and ondansetron. Methods: 32 albino mice of either sex were divided into 4 groups of 8 mice each: group I received normal saline, group II received fluoxetine; group III received fluoxetine + naloxone; group IV received fluoxetine + ondansetron. Fluoxetine and naloxone were given subcutaneously whereas ondansetron was given intraperitoneally. Eddy’s hot plate analgesiometer was used. Latency of licking of paw or jumping from the hot plate was recorded at intervals after giving study drugs in each group. Results: Fluoxetine produced a significant increase in the latency of licking of paw or jumping as compared to control at all time intervals except at 120 minutes with onset of antinociceptive effect within 30 min (p<0.01) and maximum effect at 60 min time interval (p<0.001). There was no significant difference between the control group and the fluoxetine + naloxone or fluoxetine + ondansetron group at any time point. Pre-treatment with naloxone and ondansetron antagonized the antinociceptive effects of fluoxetine. Conclusion: Administration of naloxone and ondansetron in fluoxetine treated mice antagonized the antinociceptive activity of fluoxetine. Therefore, antinociceptive activity of fluoxetine may be mediated through µ-opiod and 5HT3 receptors. Keywords: anti-nociceptive, Eddy’s hot plate, fluoxetine, naloxone, ondansetron.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objectives: Evaluate antinociceptive activity of fluoxetine and the interaction of fluoxetine with naloxone and ondansetron. Methods: 32 albino mice of either sex were divided into 4 groups of 8 mice each: group I received normal saline, group II received fluoxetine; group III received fluoxetine + naloxone; group IV received fluoxetine + ondansetron. Fluoxetine and naloxone were given subcutaneously whereas ondansetron was given intraperitoneally. Eddy’s hot plate analgesiometer was used. Latency of licking of paw or jumping from the hot plate was recorded at intervals after giving study drugs in each group. Results: Fluoxetine produced a significant increase in the latency of licking of paw or jumping as compared to control at all time intervals except at 120 minutes with onset of antinociceptive effect within 30 min (p<0.01) and maximum effect at 60 min time interval (p<0.001). There was no significant difference between the control group and the fluoxetine + naloxone or fluoxetine + ondansetron group at any time point. Pre-treatment with naloxone and ondansetron antagonized the antinociceptive effects of fluoxetine. Conclusion: Administration of naloxone and ondansetron in fluoxetine treated mice antagonized the antinociceptive activity of fluoxetine. Therefore, antinociceptive activity of fluoxetine may be mediated through µ-opiod and 5HT3 receptors. Keywords: anti-nociceptive, Eddy’s hot plate, fluoxetine, naloxone, ondansetron.

Key concepts: Fluoxetine, (+)-Naloxone, Ondansetron, Licking, Pharmacology, Nociception, Anesthesia, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EXPERIMENTAL STUDY TO EVALUATE THE ANTINOCICEPTIVE ACTIVITY OF FLUOXETINE AND ITS INTERACTION WITH NALOXONE AND ONDENSETRON IN MICE — Research Paper | ScholarLens