1997•PubMedOpen access

Analgesic effectiveness of ketorolac compared to meperidine in the rat formalin test.

B C Randolph, M A Peters

Open full text 23 citations

Abstract

The rat formalin test is an analgesic behavioral observation assessment method that demonstrates two phases of nociceptive behavior. The test consists of injecting the right hind paw with a 5% formalin solution and then observing the animal for specific nociceptive behavior. The phases represent two different types of pain. Phase 1 is pain produced by direct nerve stimulation and phase 2 is an inflammation-induced pain. The nociceptive behavior measured in this experiment was licking and biting the injected paw. A comparison of nociceptive behavior was made when ketorolac and meperidine were injected (i.p.) 10 min prior to formalin injection. As expected, a biphasic pattern of licking and biting the injected paw ensued. It was found that ketorolac had no significant reduction in licking and biting, while meperidine dramatically reduced the nociceptive response in phase 1. In phase 2, both ketorolac and meperidine caused a reduction in licking and biting; however, meperidine reduced the nociceptive response to a greater extent. This experiment demonstrates that ketorolac, when compared to meperidine, is less effective in treating pain from inflammatory origin and is not effective in treating pain from direct nerve stimulation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The rat formalin test is an analgesic behavioral observation assessment method that demonstrates two phases of nociceptive behavior. The test consists of injecting the right hind paw with a 5% formalin solution and then observing the animal for specific nociceptive behavior. The phases represent two different types of pain. Phase 1 is pain produced by direct nerve stimulation and phase 2 is an inflammation-induced pain. The nociceptive behavior measured in this experiment was licking and biting the injected paw. A comparison of nociceptive behavior was made when ketorolac and meperidine were injected (i.p.) 10 min prior to formalin injection. As expected, a biphasic pattern of licking and biting the injected paw ensued. It was found that ketorolac had no significant reduction in licking and biting, while meperidine dramatically reduced the nociceptive response in phase 1. In phase 2, both ketorolac and meperidine caused a reduction in licking and biting; however, meperidine reduced the nociceptive response to a greater extent. This experiment demonstrates that ketorolac, when compared to meperidine, is less effective in treating pain from inflammatory origin and is not effective in treating pain from direct nerve stimulation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 23 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The rat formalin test is an analgesic behavioral observation assessment method that demonstrates two phases of nociceptive behavior. The test consists of injecting the right hind paw with a 5% formalin solution and then observing the animal for specific nociceptive behavior. The phases represent two different types of pain. Phase 1 is pain produced by direct nerve stimulation and phase 2 is an inflammation-induced pain. The nociceptive behavior measured in this experiment was licking and biting the injected paw. A comparison of nociceptive behavior was made when ketorolac and meperidine were injected (i.p.) 10 min prior to formalin injection. As expected, a biphasic pattern of licking and biting the injected paw ensued. It was found that ketorolac had no significant reduction in licking and biting, while meperidine dramatically reduced the nociceptive response in phase 1. In phase 2, both ketorolac and meperidine caused a reduction in licking and biting; however, meperidine reduced the nociceptive response to a greater extent. This experiment demonstrates that ketorolac, when compared to meperidine, is less effective in treating pain from inflammatory origin and is not effective in treating pain from direct nerve stimulation.

Key concepts: Licking, Nociception, Ketorolac, Biting, Anesthesia, Medicine, Analgesic, Pethidine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analgesic effectiveness of ketorolac compared to meperidine in the rat formalin test. — Research Paper | ScholarLens