1977Energy User News; (United States)Requires access

High cost of clean air rules not fully justified

Andreas J. Wagner

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Chairman questions whether the benefits of air quality standards can be justified in view of the cost to the consumer. TVA, considering its public responsibility to include affordable power as well as promote a healthy environment, has argued these points before regulators and the courts. TVA's efforts to remove sulfur dioxide from stack gas includes tall stacks to limit the buildup of gases at ground level. Old plants, even those with tall stacks added, are severely impacted by the strict standards which will require heavy investment in aging plants and will mean the consumer must pay higher electric bills with no noticeable change in air quality. TVA estimates the annual cost of installing chemical scrubbers, new processes for washing and blending coal, and developing new coal supplies to meet the sulfur dioxide emission standards at $375 million and 2.8 billion kilowatt hours of electricity (translating into a 17 percent ;increase in costs to the consumer). Also, strict limitations on fly ash, water pollution, thermal pollution, strip mine reclamation, and mine standards will, when added to sulfur dioxide emissions standards, will result in staggering costs, Mr. Wagner feels. (DCK)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Chairman questions whether the benefits of air quality standards can be justified in view of the cost to the consumer. TVA, considering its public responsibility to include affordable power as well as promote a healthy environment, has argued these points before regulators and the courts. TVA's efforts to remove sulfur dioxide from stack gas includes tall stacks to limit the buildup of gases at ground level. Old plants, even those with tall stacks added, are severely impacted by the strict standards which will require heavy investment in aging plants and will mean the consumer must pay higher electric bills with no noticeable change in air quality. TVA estimates the annual cost of installing chemical scrubbers, new processes for washing and blending coal, and developing new coal supplies to meet the sulfur dioxide emission standards at $375 million and 2.8 billion kilowatt hours of electricity (translating into a 17 percent ;increase in costs to the consumer). Also, strict limitations on fly ash, water pollution, thermal pollution, strip mine reclamation, and mine standards will, when added to sulfur dioxide emissions standards, will result in staggering costs, Mr. Wagner feels. (DCK)

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Chairman questions whether the benefits of air quality standards can be justified in view of the cost to the consumer. TVA, considering its public responsibility to include affordable power as well as promote a healthy environment, has argued these points before regulators and the courts. TVA's efforts to remove sulfur dioxide from stack gas includes tall stacks to limit the buildup of gases at ground level. Old plants, even those with tall stacks added, are severely impacted by the strict standards which will require heavy investment in aging plants and will mean the consumer must pay higher electric bills with no noticeable change in air quality. TVA estimates the annual cost of installing chemical scrubbers, new processes for washing and blending coal, and developing new coal supplies to meet the sulfur dioxide emission standards at $375 million and 2.8 billion kilowatt hours of electricity (translating into a 17 percent ;increase in costs to the consumer). Also, strict limitations on fly ash, water pollution, thermal pollution, strip mine reclamation, and mine standards will, when added to sulfur dioxide emissions standards, will result in staggering costs, Mr. Wagner feels. (DCK)

Key concepts: Clean Air Act, Scrubber, Waste management, Electricity, Investment (military), Air pollution, Pollution, Coal

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
High cost of clean air rules not fully justified — Research Paper | ScholarLens