2015Unpublished venueRequires access

Indigenous Language Policy and Planning in Taiwan: Troku Seediq as an Example

Apay Ai-yu Tang

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

This paper identifies ongoing indigenous language problems, reexamines the current orientation and implementation of the Indigenous-Language policy and planning (ILPP), and proposes an alternative ILPP in Taiwan. The current Language-in-Education policy and planning that supports simultaneous promotion of indigenization and internationalization fails to reach the goals for linguistic pluralism and bilingualism. In addition, if the language policy and planning of the country ignores linguistic diversity, indigenous children in dominant-language schools usually experience language and culture shocks, low achievement, and other social problems. This paper shows that (i) the orientation of ILPP must shift to viewing these languages as resources; (ii) ILPP should incorporate status planning, corpus planning, and acquisition planning into top-down and bottom-up strategies , and (iii) a systematic Indigenous-Language-in Education policy including immersion programs and two-way additive bilingual programs with curricula based on indigenous epistemology offers greater chance of achieving reversal of the current critical shift toward the dominant language.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper identifies ongoing indigenous language problems, reexamines the current orientation and implementation of the Indigenous-Language policy and planning (ILPP), and proposes an alternative ILPP in Taiwan. The current Language-in-Education policy and planning that supports simultaneous promotion of indigenization and internationalization fails to reach the goals for linguistic pluralism and bilingualism. In addition, if the language policy and planning of the country ignores linguistic diversity, indigenous children in dominant-language schools usually experience language and culture shocks, low achievement, and other social problems. This paper shows that (i) the orientation of ILPP must shift to viewing these languages as resources; (ii) ILPP should incorporate status planning, corpus planning, and acquisition planning into top-down and bottom-up strategies , and (iii) a systematic Indigenous-Language-in Education policy including immersion programs and two-way additive bilingual programs with curricula based on indigenous epistemology offers greater chance of achieving reversal of the current critical shift toward the dominant language.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper identifies ongoing indigenous language problems, reexamines the current orientation and implementation of the Indigenous-Language policy and planning (ILPP), and proposes an alternative ILPP in Taiwan. The current Language-in-Education policy and planning that supports simultaneous promotion of indigenization and internationalization fails to reach the goals for linguistic pluralism and bilingualism. In addition, if the language policy and planning of the country ignores linguistic diversity, indigenous children in dominant-language schools usually experience language and culture shocks, low achievement, and other social problems. This paper shows that (i) the orientation of ILPP must shift to viewing these languages as resources; (ii) ILPP should incorporate status planning, corpus planning, and acquisition planning into top-down and bottom-up strategies , and (iii) a systematic Indigenous-Language-in Education policy including immersion programs and two-way additive bilingual programs with curricula based on indigenous epistemology offers greater chance of achieving reversal of the current critical shift toward the dominant language.

Key concepts: Language planning, Indigenous, Language policy, Indigenous language, Indigenization, Indigenous education, Ethnomathematics, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Indigenous Language Policy and Planning in Taiwan: Troku Seediq as an Example — Research Paper | ScholarLens