2010Progressive HorticultureRequires access

Response of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients in Rose

A.K. Singh, Shivam Singh

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The experiment was conducted to partially substitute the chemical fertilizers (CF) by farmyard manure (FYM) and poultry manure (PM) in combination with Azotobacter or phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) in rose. Treatments consisted of T0 (control), T1 (full dose of NPK at 50, 40, 30 g/m2 by chemical fertilizers), T2 (4 kg FYM containing 0.6, 0.5, 0.6% NPK + remaining required dose of NPK by CF), T3 (T2 + Azotobacter), T4 (T2 + PSB), T5 (2 kg PM containing 1.0, 1.4, 0.8% NPK + remaining required dose of NPK by CF), T6 (T5 + Azotobacter) and T7 (T5 + PSB). All the growth and flowering parameters were significantly influenced by the treatments. Maximum number of leaves and first-order lateral shoots/plant and length of shoot were recorded under T1 (full dose of NPK by CF) which were at par with T3 treatment. T1 treatment also conspicuously increased weight of 20 leaves and leaf area followed by T4 and T3 treatments. Fresh and dry weight of flowers during first flush increased due to T1 treatment. However, T1 treatment strikingly delayed flowering. Maximum number and weight of flowers were recorded under T1 treatment which was at par with T3 treatment. Poorest plant growth and lowest flower yield were observed under control. In general, T3 (4 kg FYM + remaining required dose of NPK by CF + Azotobacter) found beneficial in terms of better plant growth and flower yield than other treatments except T1. However, no significant difference among T1 and T3 treatments was observed on various growth parameters and yield of flowers. By using this combination half dose of chemical fertilizers can be saved.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The experiment was conducted to partially substitute the chemical fertilizers (CF) by farmyard manure (FYM) and poultry manure (PM) in combination with Azotobacter or phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) in rose. Treatments consisted of T0 (control), T1 (full dose of NPK at 50, 40, 30 g/m2 by chemical fertilizers), T2 (4 kg FYM containing 0.6, 0.5, 0.6% NPK + remaining required dose of NPK by CF), T3 (T2 + Azotobacter), T4 (T2 + PSB), T5 (2 kg PM containing 1.0, 1.4, 0.8% NPK + remaining required dose of NPK by CF), T6 (T5 + Azotobacter) and T7 (T5 + PSB). All the growth and flowering parameters were significantly influenced by the treatments. Maximum number of leaves and first-order lateral shoots/plant and length of shoot were recorded under T1 (full dose of NPK by CF) which were at par with T3 treatment. T1 treatment also conspicuously increased weight of 20 leaves and leaf area followed by T4 and T3 treatments. Fresh and dry weight of flowers during first flush increased due to T1 treatment. However, T1 treatment strikingly delayed flowering. Maximum number and weight of flowers were recorded under T1 treatment which was at par with T3 treatment. Poorest plant growth and lowest flower yield were observed under control. In general, T3 (4 kg FYM + remaining required dose of NPK by CF + Azotobacter) found beneficial in terms of better plant growth and flower yield than other treatments except T1. However, no significant difference among T1 and T3 treatments was observed on various growth parameters and yield of flowers. By using this combination half dose of chemical fertilizers can be saved.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The experiment was conducted to partially substitute the chemical fertilizers (CF) by farmyard manure (FYM) and poultry manure (PM) in combination with Azotobacter or phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) in rose. Treatments consisted of T0 (control), T1 (full dose of NPK at 50, 40, 30 g/m2 by chemical fertilizers), T2 (4 kg FYM containing 0.6, 0.5, 0.6% NPK + remaining required dose of NPK by CF), T3 (T2 + Azotobacter), T4 (T2 + PSB), T5 (2 kg PM containing 1.0, 1.4, 0.8% NPK + remaining required dose of NPK by CF), T6 (T5 + Azotobacter) and T7 (T5 + PSB). All the growth and flowering parameters were significantly influenced by the treatments. Maximum number of leaves and first-order lateral shoots/plant and length of shoot were recorded under T1 (full dose of NPK by CF) which were at par with T3 treatment. T1 treatment also conspicuously increased weight of 20 leaves and leaf area followed by T4 and T3 treatments. Fresh and dry weight of flowers during first flush increased due to T1 treatment. However, T1 treatment strikingly delayed flowering. Maximum number and weight of flowers were recorded under T1 treatment which was at par with T3 treatment. Poorest plant growth and lowest flower yield were observed under control. In general, T3 (4 kg FYM + remaining required dose of NPK by CF + Azotobacter) found beneficial in terms of better plant growth and flower yield than other treatments except T1. However, no significant difference among T1 and T3 treatments was observed on various growth parameters and yield of flowers. By using this combination half dose of chemical fertilizers can be saved.

Key concepts: Azotobacter, Shoot, Horticulture, Phosphate solubilizing bacteria, Nutrient, Animal science, Biofertilizer, Dry weight

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Response of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients in Rose — Research Paper | ScholarLens