The Necessity of Relationship between Learning and Teaching Styles in English Classes:
T Alah Yari
Abstract
T Alah Yari
Abstract
Learning styles are a student’s “natural, habitual and preferred ways” of absorbing and processing a second language. This study investigated the hypothesis that a relationship between teaching and learning styles causes learning failure, frustration and demonization. Data were collected through Reid’s questionnaire, interviews and tests using 52 EFL students and 12 EFL teachers at a Asia Language Institute in Tabriz. It was found that learners favored Kinesthetic and Auditory and disfavored Individual and Group styles, while teachers favored Kinesthetic, Group and Auditory styles and disfavored Tactile and Individual styles; Western teachers also disfavored Auditory styles. There was therefore a relationship regarding Group and Auditory styles. Interviews revealed that 72% of the students were frustrated by a relationship between teaching and learning styles; 76% said it affected their learning, often seriously; and 81% of the teachers agreed with Reid’s hypothesis. The correlations between learning style, proficiency and discipline were also checked. Learners who favored Group styles were significantly less proficient. Conclusions are that EFL teachers should teach in a balanced style in order to accommodate different learning styles.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Learning styles are a student’s “natural, habitual and preferred ways” of absorbing and processing a second language. This study investigated the hypothesis that a relationship between teaching and learning styles causes learning failure, frustration and demonization. Data were collected through Reid’s questionnaire, interviews and tests using 52 EFL students and 12 EFL teachers at a Asia Language Institute in Tabriz. It was found that learners favored Kinesthetic and Auditory and disfavored Individual and Group styles, while teachers favored Kinesthetic, Group and Auditory styles and disfavored Tactile and Individual styles; Western teachers also disfavored Auditory styles. There was therefore a relationship regarding Group and Auditory styles. Interviews revealed that 72% of the students were frustrated by a relationship between teaching and learning styles; 76% said it affected their learning, often seriously; and 81% of the teachers agreed with Reid’s hypothesis. The correlations between learning style, proficiency and discipline were also checked. Learners who favored Group styles were significantly less proficient. Conclusions are that EFL teachers should teach in a balanced style in order to accommodate different learning styles.
Key concepts: Kinesthetic learning, Learning styles, Psychology, Style (visual arts), Mathematics education, Auditory learning, Pedagogy, Visual arts