2006Pesticide Research JournalRequires access

Field Evaluation of Methomyl against Mealy Bug, Maconellicoccus Hirsutus (Green) and dredatory yoccinellid, Cryptolaemus Montrouzieri Mulsand in Grapes

S. Raguraman, K Premalatha

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Bio-efficacy experiments conducted in two concurrent trials from December to April and Aprii lo August tndicate that methomyl (LannateR 40 SP) at 500–800 g ai ha−1 was effective in containing the populations of mealy bug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus on grapes. Methomyl 300–600 g ai ha−1 registered higher pepplation of predatory coccinellids than other treatments in both the trials; howeverr it was sot comparable with untreated check. But better recolonization of coccinellids was noticed in methomyl treatments than in dimethoate. Methomyl at 500–800 g ai ha−1 recorded the maximum fruit yield (14–17.5 t ha−1), which were superior to other treatments including methomyl 300 g and 400 g ai ha−1 and dimethoate 300 g ai ha−1. The methomyl treatments at 500, 600, 700 and 800 g ai ha−1 gave higher returns in grapevine cultivation with cost-benefit ratios of 1:14.8, 1:16.5, 1:16.6 and 1:16.5, respectively, when compared to dimethoate application and untreated check.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Bio-efficacy experiments conducted in two concurrent trials from December to April and Aprii lo August tndicate that methomyl (LannateR 40 SP) at 500–800 g ai ha−1 was effective in containing the populations of mealy bug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus on grapes. Methomyl 300–600 g ai ha−1 registered higher pepplation of predatory coccinellids than other treatments in both the trials; howeverr it was sot comparable with untreated check. But better recolonization of coccinellids was noticed in methomyl treatments than in dimethoate. Methomyl at 500–800 g ai ha−1 recorded the maximum fruit yield (14–17.5 t ha−1), which were superior to other treatments including methomyl 300 g and 400 g ai ha−1 and dimethoate 300 g ai ha−1. The methomyl treatments at 500, 600, 700 and 800 g ai ha−1 gave higher returns in grapevine cultivation with cost-benefit ratios of 1:14.8, 1:16.5, 1:16.6 and 1:16.5, respectively, when compared to dimethoate application and untreated check.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Bio-efficacy experiments conducted in two concurrent trials from December to April and Aprii lo August tndicate that methomyl (LannateR 40 SP) at 500–800 g ai ha−1 was effective in containing the populations of mealy bug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus on grapes. Methomyl 300–600 g ai ha−1 registered higher pepplation of predatory coccinellids than other treatments in both the trials; howeverr it was sot comparable with untreated check. But better recolonization of coccinellids was noticed in methomyl treatments than in dimethoate. Methomyl at 500–800 g ai ha−1 recorded the maximum fruit yield (14–17.5 t ha−1), which were superior to other treatments including methomyl 300 g and 400 g ai ha−1 and dimethoate 300 g ai ha−1. The methomyl treatments at 500, 600, 700 and 800 g ai ha−1 gave higher returns in grapevine cultivation with cost-benefit ratios of 1:14.8, 1:16.5, 1:16.6 and 1:16.5, respectively, when compared to dimethoate application and untreated check.

Key concepts: Methomyl, Dimethoate, Toxicology, Biology, Forensic science, Horticulture, Veterinary medicine, Agronomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Field Evaluation of Methomyl against Mealy Bug, Maconellicoccus Hirsutus (Green) and dredatory yoccinellid, Cryptolaemus Montrouzieri Mulsand in Grapes — Research Paper | ScholarLens