1992Zeitschrift für Naturforschung COpen access

A Simplified Combination of DNA Probe Preparation and Fluorescence in situ Hybridization

D Celeda, Ulrich Bettag, Christoph Cremer

Open full text 14 citations

Abstract

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has found widespread applications in cytogenetics. So far the standard protocols for probe amplification (and simultaneous labeling) by PCR, nick translation and in situ hybridization involve different buffer systems leading to a number of time consuming washing steps even before hybridization. In this manuscript we show a fast technique of a close combination of DNA probe preparation and in situ hybridization (ISH). This method was applied to metaphase chromosomes from human lymphocytes fixed on slides. Two specific repetitive DNA probes, the pUC 1.77 DNA probe and the DYZ1 repetitive DNA fraction were used, amplified and labeled in different ways. Additional experiments with total genomic male human DNA as the DNA probe suggest that this method may be extended to a large variety of other probes. Moreover the ISH technique described does not require toxic denaturing agents, such as formamide.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has found widespread applications in cytogenetics. So far the standard protocols for probe amplification (and simultaneous labeling) by PCR, nick translation and in situ hybridization involve different buffer systems leading to a number of time consuming washing steps even before hybridization. In this manuscript we show a fast technique of a close combination of DNA probe preparation and in situ hybridization (ISH). This method was applied to metaphase chromosomes from human lymphocytes fixed on slides. Two specific repetitive DNA probes, the pUC 1.77 DNA probe and the DYZ1 repetitive DNA fraction were used, amplified and labeled in different ways. Additional experiments with total genomic male human DNA as the DNA probe suggest that this method may be extended to a large variety of other probes. Moreover the ISH technique described does not require toxic denaturing agents, such as formamide.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has found widespread applications in cytogenetics. So far the standard protocols for probe amplification (and simultaneous labeling) by PCR, nick translation and in situ hybridization involve different buffer systems leading to a number of time consuming washing steps even before hybridization. In this manuscript we show a fast technique of a close combination of DNA probe preparation and in situ hybridization (ISH). This method was applied to metaphase chromosomes from human lymphocytes fixed on slides. Two specific repetitive DNA probes, the pUC 1.77 DNA probe and the DYZ1 repetitive DNA fraction were used, amplified and labeled in different ways. Additional experiments with total genomic male human DNA as the DNA probe suggest that this method may be extended to a large variety of other probes. Moreover the ISH technique described does not require toxic denaturing agents, such as formamide.

Key concepts: Nick translation, In situ hybridization, Hybridization probe, Molecular biology, Fluorescence in situ hybridization, DNA, In situ, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Simplified Combination of DNA Probe Preparation and Fluorescence in situ Hybridization — Research Paper | ScholarLens