2008SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Strong Evidence of a Small Harm

Craig M. Pease

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

In American Farm Bureau Federation v. EPA, a consortium of states and environmental groups challenge the EPA's 2006 rule setting a National Ambient Air Quality Standard for fine particulate matter air pollution. EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson made a clean sweep of the medical and scientific communities, rejecting the advice of physicians, an external advisory committee, and internal agency scientists. Consider the two-pronged legal defense offered by the Department of Justice: The science is uncertain. And the agency's decision should receive deference. The evidence that there are significant health impacts of fine particular air pollution below the standard set by EPA is quite strong.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In American Farm Bureau Federation v. EPA, a consortium of states and environmental groups challenge the EPA's 2006 rule setting a National Ambient Air Quality Standard for fine particulate matter air pollution. EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson made a clean sweep of the medical and scientific communities, rejecting the advice of physicians, an external advisory committee, and internal agency scientists. Consider the two-pronged legal defense offered by the Department of Justice: The science is uncertain. And the agency's decision should receive deference. The evidence that there are significant health impacts of fine particular air pollution below the standard set by EPA is quite strong.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In American Farm Bureau Federation v. EPA, a consortium of states and environmental groups challenge the EPA's 2006 rule setting a National Ambient Air Quality Standard for fine particulate matter air pollution. EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson made a clean sweep of the medical and scientific communities, rejecting the advice of physicians, an external advisory committee, and internal agency scientists. Consider the two-pronged legal defense offered by the Department of Justice: The science is uncertain. And the agency's decision should receive deference. The evidence that there are significant health impacts of fine particular air pollution below the standard set by EPA is quite strong.

Key concepts: Harm, Deference, Agency (philosophy), Clean Air Act, Air pollution, Political science, Air quality index, Public administration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Strong Evidence of a Small Harm — Research Paper | ScholarLens