Strong Evidence of a Small Harm
Craig M. Pease
Abstract
Craig M. Pease
Abstract
In American Farm Bureau Federation v. EPA, a consortium of states and environmental groups challenge the EPA's 2006 rule setting a National Ambient Air Quality Standard for fine particulate matter air pollution. EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson made a clean sweep of the medical and scientific communities, rejecting the advice of physicians, an external advisory committee, and internal agency scientists. Consider the two-pronged legal defense offered by the Department of Justice: The science is uncertain. And the agency's decision should receive deference. The evidence that there are significant health impacts of fine particular air pollution below the standard set by EPA is quite strong.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In American Farm Bureau Federation v. EPA, a consortium of states and environmental groups challenge the EPA's 2006 rule setting a National Ambient Air Quality Standard for fine particulate matter air pollution. EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson made a clean sweep of the medical and scientific communities, rejecting the advice of physicians, an external advisory committee, and internal agency scientists. Consider the two-pronged legal defense offered by the Department of Justice: The science is uncertain. And the agency's decision should receive deference. The evidence that there are significant health impacts of fine particular air pollution below the standard set by EPA is quite strong.
Key concepts: Harm, Deference, Agency (philosophy), Clean Air Act, Air pollution, Political science, Air quality index, Public administration