Ultra-Low Dose Cardiac CT Angiography at 80 kV using Second Generation Dual-Source CT: Assessment of Radiation Dose and Image Quality
Leif Christopher Engel
Abstract
Leif Christopher Engel
Abstract
Objectives: We sought to determine the feasibility of using 80 kV in clinical cardiac CTA, by comparing radiation doses and image quality versus standardized 100 kV protocols. Methods: In this retrospective study, a tube potential of 80 kV was used in 40 consecutive patients (BMI 22.6 ± 2.8). 40 matched patients (BMI 23.1 ± 2.8) were scanned with a tube potential of 100 kV and served as the control group. Qualitative and quantitative image quality parameters were determined in the proximal and distal segments of the coronary arteries. Results: Similar subjective image quality scores were seen between the two protocols. The mean CNR and SNR were at 100 kV vs 80 kV (CNR 19.9 ± 6.0 vs 15.7 ± 5.5; p<0.01 and SNR 17.7 ± 5.5 vs 14.4 ± 4.9). The median radiation dose for the 80 kV protocol was significantly lower compared to the 100 kV protocol (83.0 mGy x cm [58.0- 134.0] vs 193.0 mGy x cm [108.5-225.0]; p<0.01) Conclusion: A tube potential of 80 kV is feasible and results in a radiation dose reduction of 57% compared to 100 kV protocols while preserving subjective image quality.
OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objectives: We sought to determine the feasibility of using 80 kV in clinical cardiac CTA, by comparing radiation doses and image quality versus standardized 100 kV protocols. Methods: In this retrospective study, a tube potential of 80 kV was used in 40 consecutive patients (BMI 22.6 ± 2.8). 40 matched patients (BMI 23.1 ± 2.8) were scanned with a tube potential of 100 kV and served as the control group. Qualitative and quantitative image quality parameters were determined in the proximal and distal segments of the coronary arteries. Results: Similar subjective image quality scores were seen between the two protocols. The mean CNR and SNR were at 100 kV vs 80 kV (CNR 19.9 ± 6.0 vs 15.7 ± 5.5; p<0.01 and SNR 17.7 ± 5.5 vs 14.4 ± 4.9). The median radiation dose for the 80 kV protocol was significantly lower compared to the 100 kV protocol (83.0 mGy x cm [58.0- 134.0] vs 193.0 mGy x cm [108.5-225.0]; p<0.01) Conclusion: A tube potential of 80 kV is feasible and results in a radiation dose reduction of 57% compared to 100 kV protocols while preserving subjective image quality.
Key concepts: Image quality, Medicine, Radiation dose, Nuclear medicine, Effective dose (radiation), Radiation exposure, Angiography, Coronary angiography