2002The Journal of Poultry ScienceRequires access

Combined Treatment of Keloid with Surgical Excision, Steroid Injection and Electron Beam Therapy

Jung‐Hsing Yen, I-Chen Chen, Ling-Fen Ou, Yu-Wen Tang, Gin-Chin Lin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

There numerous clinical reports of keloid treatments. In this paper we had evaluated the effectiveness of a combination therapy in steroid injection, and electron beam irradiation of keloid treatments in our hospital. There were two groups: excision followed by electron beam therapy (Group l) and excision with the steroid injection followed by electron beam therapy (Group 2). The result of the treatments was recorded as ”good”, ”improved”, or ”failure”. In group 1, 43 keloids in 39 patients were treated. Average follow-up period was 31.1±4.5 months. There were 16 keloid treatments that resulted in ”failure”. The recurrent rate was 37%. In Group 2, 31 keloids in 26 patients were treated. The average follow-up period was 13.1±5.7 months. There were 5 keloid treatments that resulted in ”failure” and the recurrent rate was 16.1%. There was a significant difference between group 1 and 2(P=0.0472). Wound disruption with poor healing and secondary procedure was performed in three patients. The cosmetic result was improved in both methods. However, the ”multiple combination treatment”, with the excision of keloid, injection with the steroid immediately followed by electron beam therapy was more beneficial and effective. It provided us an alternative method for treatment of disfiguring or refractory keloid lesion.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There numerous clinical reports of keloid treatments. In this paper we had evaluated the effectiveness of a combination therapy in steroid injection, and electron beam irradiation of keloid treatments in our hospital. There were two groups: excision followed by electron beam therapy (Group l) and excision with the steroid injection followed by electron beam therapy (Group 2). The result of the treatments was recorded as ”good”, ”improved”, or ”failure”. In group 1, 43 keloids in 39 patients were treated. Average follow-up period was 31.1±4.5 months. There were 16 keloid treatments that resulted in ”failure”. The recurrent rate was 37%. In Group 2, 31 keloids in 26 patients were treated. The average follow-up period was 13.1±5.7 months. There were 5 keloid treatments that resulted in ”failure” and the recurrent rate was 16.1%. There was a significant difference between group 1 and 2(P=0.0472). Wound disruption with poor healing and secondary procedure was performed in three patients. The cosmetic result was improved in both methods. However, the ”multiple combination treatment”, with the excision of keloid, injection with the steroid immediately followed by electron beam therapy was more beneficial and effective. It provided us an alternative method for treatment of disfiguring or refractory keloid lesion.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There numerous clinical reports of keloid treatments. In this paper we had evaluated the effectiveness of a combination therapy in steroid injection, and electron beam irradiation of keloid treatments in our hospital. There were two groups: excision followed by electron beam therapy (Group l) and excision with the steroid injection followed by electron beam therapy (Group 2). The result of the treatments was recorded as ”good”, ”improved”, or ”failure”. In group 1, 43 keloids in 39 patients were treated. Average follow-up period was 31.1±4.5 months. There were 16 keloid treatments that resulted in ”failure”. The recurrent rate was 37%. In Group 2, 31 keloids in 26 patients were treated. The average follow-up period was 13.1±5.7 months. There were 5 keloid treatments that resulted in ”failure” and the recurrent rate was 16.1%. There was a significant difference between group 1 and 2(P=0.0472). Wound disruption with poor healing and secondary procedure was performed in three patients. The cosmetic result was improved in both methods. However, the ”multiple combination treatment”, with the excision of keloid, injection with the steroid immediately followed by electron beam therapy was more beneficial and effective. It provided us an alternative method for treatment of disfiguring or refractory keloid lesion.

Key concepts: Keloid, Medicine, Surgery, Lesion, Steroid, Refractory (planetary science), Internal medicine, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Combined Treatment of Keloid with Surgical Excision, Steroid Injection and Electron Beam Therapy — Research Paper | ScholarLens