1996•Unpublished venueRequires access

NONRESPONSE ISSUES IN HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEYS

Anthony James Richardson, Elizabeth S. Ampt, A H Meyburg

Open publisher page 17 citations

Abstract

Sample surveys in transport are invariably associated with some level of nonresponse. The issue of nonresponse is fundamentally connected with the questions of reducing survey bias and increasing the accuracy of sample estimates. This is because nonrespondents are from segments of the population having characteristics significantly different from those of respondents. The differences are in sociodemographic characteristics and, more important, in travel behavior characteristics. Some of the background concepts of transport surveys within which nonresponse should be considered are described. In particular, the distinction between sampling error and survey bias and the trade-offs between quantity, quality, and cost of survey data are described. Ways of reducing nonresponse and the impacts of nonresponse are discussed. The need to consider all sources of nonresponse in different types of survey and the importance of using consistent methods of calculating nonresponse are stressed. The use of population expansion factors, nonreporting weights, and nonresponse weights as ways of allowing for the remaining extent of nonresponse is described. The use of these methods is demonstrated by reference to a mailback questionnaire survey.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Sample surveys in transport are invariably associated with some level of nonresponse. The issue of nonresponse is fundamentally connected with the questions of reducing survey bias and increasing the accuracy of sample estimates. This is because nonrespondents are from segments of the population having characteristics significantly different from those of respondents. The differences are in sociodemographic characteristics and, more important, in travel behavior characteristics. Some of the background concepts of transport surveys within which nonresponse should be considered are described. In particular, the distinction between sampling error and survey bias and the trade-offs between quantity, quality, and cost of survey data are described. Ways of reducing nonresponse and the impacts of nonresponse are discussed. The need to consider all sources of nonresponse in different types of survey and the importance of using consistent methods of calculating nonresponse are stressed. The use of population expansion factors, nonreporting weights, and nonresponse weights as ways of allowing for the remaining extent of nonresponse is described. The use of these methods is demonstrated by reference to a mailback questionnaire survey.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Sample surveys in transport are invariably associated with some level of nonresponse. The issue of nonresponse is fundamentally connected with the questions of reducing survey bias and increasing the accuracy of sample estimates. This is because nonrespondents are from segments of the population having characteristics significantly different from those of respondents. The differences are in sociodemographic characteristics and, more important, in travel behavior characteristics. Some of the background concepts of transport surveys within which nonresponse should be considered are described. In particular, the distinction between sampling error and survey bias and the trade-offs between quantity, quality, and cost of survey data are described. Ways of reducing nonresponse and the impacts of nonresponse are discussed. The need to consider all sources of nonresponse in different types of survey and the importance of using consistent methods of calculating nonresponse are stressed. The use of population expansion factors, nonreporting weights, and nonresponse weights as ways of allowing for the remaining extent of nonresponse is described. The use of these methods is demonstrated by reference to a mailback questionnaire survey.

Key concepts: Non-response bias, Sample (material), Sampling (signal processing), Survey sampling, Survey methodology, Population, Econometrics, Statistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source