1991Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

CODE PREDICTIONS VERSUS SMALL SCALE BRIDGE DECK MODEL TEST MEASUREMENTS

Philip C. Perdikaris, M. Petrou

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

This paper presents the test results of eight 1/6.6 bridge deck models of an 8.5 in. thick and 50 ft long prototype concrete bridge deck supported on four simply supported steel girders spaced at 7 ft or 10 ft and subjected to a static concentrated wheel-load. The effects of the lateral restraint, girder spacing and amount of reinforcement on the behavior of the deck is determined and discussed. In addition to the enhancement of the ultimate load carrying capacity of the deck, membrane compressive forces present in the deck may shift the primary failure mode from a flexural type to that of punching shear. The effect of this arching action mechanism on the bridge deck response explains the differences between the observed ultimate strength values and the shear strength predictions by the ACI 318 and the European CEB Code. The shear capacity code predictions are conservative (down to about 28% of the measured ultimate strength values). The level of restraint (deck continuity) in a non-composite bridge deck affects the arching action mechanism considerably higher than the amount of reinforcement specified by the AASHTO and Ontario design approach and the girder spacing used in existing highway concrete bridge decks (7 to 10 ft).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper presents the test results of eight 1/6.6 bridge deck models of an 8.5 in. thick and 50 ft long prototype concrete bridge deck supported on four simply supported steel girders spaced at 7 ft or 10 ft and subjected to a static concentrated wheel-load. The effects of the lateral restraint, girder spacing and amount of reinforcement on the behavior of the deck is determined and discussed. In addition to the enhancement of the ultimate load carrying capacity of the deck, membrane compressive forces present in the deck may shift the primary failure mode from a flexural type to that of punching shear. The effect of this arching action mechanism on the bridge deck response explains the differences between the observed ultimate strength values and the shear strength predictions by the ACI 318 and the European CEB Code. The shear capacity code predictions are conservative (down to about 28% of the measured ultimate strength values). The level of restraint (deck continuity) in a non-composite bridge deck affects the arching action mechanism considerably higher than the amount of reinforcement specified by the AASHTO and Ontario design approach and the girder spacing used in existing highway concrete bridge decks (7 to 10 ft).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper presents the test results of eight 1/6.6 bridge deck models of an 8.5 in. thick and 50 ft long prototype concrete bridge deck supported on four simply supported steel girders spaced at 7 ft or 10 ft and subjected to a static concentrated wheel-load. The effects of the lateral restraint, girder spacing and amount of reinforcement on the behavior of the deck is determined and discussed. In addition to the enhancement of the ultimate load carrying capacity of the deck, membrane compressive forces present in the deck may shift the primary failure mode from a flexural type to that of punching shear. The effect of this arching action mechanism on the bridge deck response explains the differences between the observed ultimate strength values and the shear strength predictions by the ACI 318 and the European CEB Code. The shear capacity code predictions are conservative (down to about 28% of the measured ultimate strength values). The level of restraint (deck continuity) in a non-composite bridge deck affects the arching action mechanism considerably higher than the amount of reinforcement specified by the AASHTO and Ontario design approach and the girder spacing used in existing highway concrete bridge decks (7 to 10 ft).

Key concepts: Deck, Structural engineering, Girder, Punching, Engineering, Reinforcement, Bridge (graph theory), Geotechnical engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
CODE PREDICTIONS VERSUS SMALL SCALE BRIDGE DECK MODEL TEST MEASUREMENTS — Research Paper | ScholarLens