1988Unpublished venueRequires access

DESIGN OF CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS. FINAL REPORT

Philip C. Perdikaris, S R Beim

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The static ultimate strength, fatigue life and failure mode of reinforced concrete highway bridge deck slabs supported on steel girders is determined by testing small-scale deck models under static, fixed pulsating and moving constant wheel-load. The specimens included a 1/6.6 scale bridge model of a 50-ft long prototype bridge deck (with a girder spacing of 7 ft and a slab thickness of 8.5 in.) and a 1/3 scale panel model of a portion of the deck. Both isotropic (steel ratio of 0.3% in both directions in each face - Ontario bridge design code) and orthotropic (steel ratio of 0.7% in longitudinal and 0.35% in transverse direction in each face - AASHTO code) reinforcing arrangements were considered. For the isotropically reinforced decks (43% reduction in steel content compared to the AASHTO design) a safety factor against static ultimate strength equal to 17.5 was determined. The moving wheel-load resulted in far shorter fatigue life than the pulsating load, especially for the orthotropically reinforced decks. The failure mode was punching rather than flexure. Under the fixed pulsating load a radial fan-shaped cracking pattern formed at the bottom surface of the deck, while under the moving wheel-load cracking followed the location of the bottom bars (grid form) indicating flexural debonding prior to punching. Under the AASHTO design prototype load of 20.8 kips the measured maximum steel stress is less than 3 ksi. Under either static or fatigue laoding the reinforcing steel may yield just before deck failure (punching).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The static ultimate strength, fatigue life and failure mode of reinforced concrete highway bridge deck slabs supported on steel girders is determined by testing small-scale deck models under static, fixed pulsating and moving constant wheel-load. The specimens included a 1/6.6 scale bridge model of a 50-ft long prototype bridge deck (with a girder spacing of 7 ft and a slab thickness of 8.5 in.) and a 1/3 scale panel model of a portion of the deck. Both isotropic (steel ratio of 0.3% in both directions in each face - Ontario bridge design code) and orthotropic (steel ratio of 0.7% in longitudinal and 0.35% in transverse direction in each face - AASHTO code) reinforcing arrangements were considered. For the isotropically reinforced decks (43% reduction in steel content compared to the AASHTO design) a safety factor against static ultimate strength equal to 17.5 was determined. The moving wheel-load resulted in far shorter fatigue life than the pulsating load, especially for the orthotropically reinforced decks. The failure mode was punching rather than flexure. Under the fixed pulsating load a radial fan-shaped cracking pattern formed at the bottom surface of the deck, while under the moving wheel-load cracking followed the location of the bottom bars (grid form) indicating flexural debonding prior to punching. Under the AASHTO design prototype load of 20.8 kips the measured maximum steel stress is less than 3 ksi. Under either static or fatigue laoding the reinforcing steel may yield just before deck failure (punching).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The static ultimate strength, fatigue life and failure mode of reinforced concrete highway bridge deck slabs supported on steel girders is determined by testing small-scale deck models under static, fixed pulsating and moving constant wheel-load. The specimens included a 1/6.6 scale bridge model of a 50-ft long prototype bridge deck (with a girder spacing of 7 ft and a slab thickness of 8.5 in.) and a 1/3 scale panel model of a portion of the deck. Both isotropic (steel ratio of 0.3% in both directions in each face - Ontario bridge design code) and orthotropic (steel ratio of 0.7% in longitudinal and 0.35% in transverse direction in each face - AASHTO code) reinforcing arrangements were considered. For the isotropically reinforced decks (43% reduction in steel content compared to the AASHTO design) a safety factor against static ultimate strength equal to 17.5 was determined. The moving wheel-load resulted in far shorter fatigue life than the pulsating load, especially for the orthotropically reinforced decks. The failure mode was punching rather than flexure. Under the fixed pulsating load a radial fan-shaped cracking pattern formed at the bottom surface of the deck, while under the moving wheel-load cracking followed the location of the bottom bars (grid form) indicating flexural debonding prior to punching. Under the AASHTO design prototype load of 20.8 kips the measured maximum steel stress is less than 3 ksi. Under either static or fatigue laoding the reinforcing steel may yield just before deck failure (punching).

Key concepts: Structural engineering, Deck, Girder, Cracking, Punching, Failure mode and effects analysis, Slab, Spall

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
DESIGN OF CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS. FINAL REPORT — Research Paper | ScholarLens