1994Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)Requires access

U.S. Africa Policy: Some Possible Course Adjustment

Daniel H. Simpson, Déborah Cohen

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

U.S. relations with Africa traditionally have been low on the list of overall U.S. foreign policy interests. However, Africa remains a minefield of issues with the potential of involving the United States, either bilaterally or through the United Nations or regional organizations, as witnessed by the situation in war-torn Rwanda. Ambassador Daniel H. Simpson addresses the question of U.S. interests in Africa and past, present, and future U.S. policy toward that continent. His message, in addition to being an introspective examination, is forward-looking. He seeks to lay the basis for a long-term, sustainable U.S. policy toward Africa based on both solid economic and commercial concerns--Africa as a supplier and a market--and on the real cultural ties that link what is core to America and the people of the African continent. Africa, Humanitarian support, Economic social and political problems, Cold War, African Command (AFCOM).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

U.S. relations with Africa traditionally have been low on the list of overall U.S. foreign policy interests. However, Africa remains a minefield of issues with the potential of involving the United States, either bilaterally or through the United Nations or regional organizations, as witnessed by the situation in war-torn Rwanda. Ambassador Daniel H. Simpson addresses the question of U.S. interests in Africa and past, present, and future U.S. policy toward that continent. His message, in addition to being an introspective examination, is forward-looking. He seeks to lay the basis for a long-term, sustainable U.S. policy toward Africa based on both solid economic and commercial concerns--Africa as a supplier and a market--and on the real cultural ties that link what is core to America and the people of the African continent. Africa, Humanitarian support, Economic social and political problems, Cold War, African Command (AFCOM).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

U.S. relations with Africa traditionally have been low on the list of overall U.S. foreign policy interests. However, Africa remains a minefield of issues with the potential of involving the United States, either bilaterally or through the United Nations or regional organizations, as witnessed by the situation in war-torn Rwanda. Ambassador Daniel H. Simpson addresses the question of U.S. interests in Africa and past, present, and future U.S. policy toward that continent. His message, in addition to being an introspective examination, is forward-looking. He seeks to lay the basis for a long-term, sustainable U.S. policy toward Africa based on both solid economic and commercial concerns--Africa as a supplier and a market--and on the real cultural ties that link what is core to America and the people of the African continent. Africa, Humanitarian support, Economic social and political problems, Cold War, African Command (AFCOM).

Key concepts: Foreign policy, Politics, Cold war, Political science, Introspection, Development economics, Political economy, Economy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
U.S. Africa Policy: Some Possible Course Adjustment — Research Paper | ScholarLens