2014Journal of Entomological ResearchRequires access

Ecofriendly integrated pest management in pigeonpea

B.V. Bhede, B.B. Bhosle, S.T. Shinde, O. P. Sharma

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The pest population was less in IPM fields than non-IPM fields. The population of pod borer larvae was 0.39/plant in IPM and 0.64/plant in non-IPM. Plume moth larvae were 0.16 and 0.25/plant in IPM and non-IPM fields, respectively. The webbing by spotted pod borer was 0.08 and 0.19/plant in IPM and non-IPM fields, respectively. The pod damage due to pod borer complex was less in IPM (7.71 per cent) than non-IPM (21.52 per cent) fields. The immature stages (maggot and pupa) of pod fly were 2.14 and 7.99/50 pods in IPM and non-IPM fields, respectively. The population of natural enemies of insects like coccinellids (0.21 in IPM and 0.09/plant in non-IPM), chrysopids (0.03 in IPM and 0.01/plant in non-IPM) and spider (0.36 in IPM and 0.24/plant in non-IPM) was more in IPM fields. The parasitization of pod borer larvae was 3.63 per cent in IPM and 1.78 per cent in non-IPM. The impact of the IPM practices resulted in increased yield (10.18 q/ha in IPM and 8.41 q/ha in non-IPM) and net profit (Rs. 7710/ha).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The pest population was less in IPM fields than non-IPM fields. The population of pod borer larvae was 0.39/plant in IPM and 0.64/plant in non-IPM. Plume moth larvae were 0.16 and 0.25/plant in IPM and non-IPM fields, respectively. The webbing by spotted pod borer was 0.08 and 0.19/plant in IPM and non-IPM fields, respectively. The pod damage due to pod borer complex was less in IPM (7.71 per cent) than non-IPM (21.52 per cent) fields. The immature stages (maggot and pupa) of pod fly were 2.14 and 7.99/50 pods in IPM and non-IPM fields, respectively. The population of natural enemies of insects like coccinellids (0.21 in IPM and 0.09/plant in non-IPM), chrysopids (0.03 in IPM and 0.01/plant in non-IPM) and spider (0.36 in IPM and 0.24/plant in non-IPM) was more in IPM fields. The parasitization of pod borer larvae was 3.63 per cent in IPM and 1.78 per cent in non-IPM. The impact of the IPM practices resulted in increased yield (10.18 q/ha in IPM and 8.41 q/ha in non-IPM) and net profit (Rs. 7710/ha).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The pest population was less in IPM fields than non-IPM fields. The population of pod borer larvae was 0.39/plant in IPM and 0.64/plant in non-IPM. Plume moth larvae were 0.16 and 0.25/plant in IPM and non-IPM fields, respectively. The webbing by spotted pod borer was 0.08 and 0.19/plant in IPM and non-IPM fields, respectively. The pod damage due to pod borer complex was less in IPM (7.71 per cent) than non-IPM (21.52 per cent) fields. The immature stages (maggot and pupa) of pod fly were 2.14 and 7.99/50 pods in IPM and non-IPM fields, respectively. The population of natural enemies of insects like coccinellids (0.21 in IPM and 0.09/plant in non-IPM), chrysopids (0.03 in IPM and 0.01/plant in non-IPM) and spider (0.36 in IPM and 0.24/plant in non-IPM) was more in IPM fields. The parasitization of pod borer larvae was 3.63 per cent in IPM and 1.78 per cent in non-IPM. The impact of the IPM practices resulted in increased yield (10.18 q/ha in IPM and 8.41 q/ha in non-IPM) and net profit (Rs. 7710/ha).

Key concepts: Integrated pest management, Point of delivery, Biology, Population, PEST analysis, Agronomy, Pupa, Pest control

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Ecofriendly integrated pest management in pigeonpea — Research Paper | ScholarLens