1982Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

PERFORMANCE-BASED FUNDING-ALLOCATION GUIDELINES FOR TRANSIT OPERATORS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY

Gordon J. Fielding, Subhash R Mundle, J Misner

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

During the last five years, transit performance indicators have been widely used in the transit industry. California and New York have used performance indicators to determine eligibility for funding. In Pennsylvania, transit performance measures have been used to provide incentive payments for superior performance, and in Michigan a detailed analysis of transit operations provides the basis for state managerial assistance. In Los Angeles County, nine transit operators, including Southern California Rapid Transit District, provide fixed-route transit service. Between 1977 and 1980, operating cost per vehicle hour increased from $28.52 to $38.76, a rate higher than the consumer price index for the Los Angeles area. In response to state legislation designed to maximize utilization of public subsidies for transit, the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission undertook the development of performance-based guidelines for allocating transit subsidies. The performance guidelines developed in cooperation with the local transit operators are presented here. In this program, service is classified into local and express categories. Seven indicators were chosen to monitor transit performance on a periodic basis. Three indicators were selected to establish standards to be achieved by all fixed-route service operators in Los Angeles County. Compliance with these standards will determine eligibility for discretionary funds (representing 5 percent of operating assistance) in the future. The methodology for quantifying loss of subsidy funds if an operator falls below the established standards is also described. The performance guidelines merit consideration for two reasons. First, they represent an attempt by a large metropolitan area to control transit costs, and second they initiate performance-based funding allocation rather than funding based on demographic characteristics or operating deficits. Both reasons are substantial advancements in the theory and application of performance-based guidelines to transit-financing issues.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

During the last five years, transit performance indicators have been widely used in the transit industry. California and New York have used performance indicators to determine eligibility for funding. In Pennsylvania, transit performance measures have been used to provide incentive payments for superior performance, and in Michigan a detailed analysis of transit operations provides the basis for state managerial assistance. In Los Angeles County, nine transit operators, including Southern California Rapid Transit District, provide fixed-route transit service. Between 1977 and 1980, operating cost per vehicle hour increased from $28.52 to $38.76, a rate higher than the consumer price index for the Los Angeles area. In response to state legislation designed to maximize utilization of public subsidies for transit, the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission undertook the development of performance-based guidelines for allocating transit subsidies. The performance guidelines developed in cooperation with the local transit operators are presented here. In this program, service is classified into local and express categories. Seven indicators were chosen to monitor transit performance on a periodic basis. Three indicators were selected to establish standards to be achieved by all fixed-route service operators in Los Angeles County. Compliance with these standards will determine eligibility for discretionary funds (representing 5 percent of operating assistance) in the future. The methodology for quantifying loss of subsidy funds if an operator falls below the established standards is also described. The performance guidelines merit consideration for two reasons. First, they represent an attempt by a large metropolitan area to control transit costs, and second they initiate performance-based funding allocation rather than funding based on demographic characteristics or operating deficits. Both reasons are substantial advancements in the theory and application of performance-based guidelines to transit-financing issues.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

During the last five years, transit performance indicators have been widely used in the transit industry. California and New York have used performance indicators to determine eligibility for funding. In Pennsylvania, transit performance measures have been used to provide incentive payments for superior performance, and in Michigan a detailed analysis of transit operations provides the basis for state managerial assistance. In Los Angeles County, nine transit operators, including Southern California Rapid Transit District, provide fixed-route transit service. Between 1977 and 1980, operating cost per vehicle hour increased from $28.52 to $38.76, a rate higher than the consumer price index for the Los Angeles area. In response to state legislation designed to maximize utilization of public subsidies for transit, the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission undertook the development of performance-based guidelines for allocating transit subsidies. The performance guidelines developed in cooperation with the local transit operators are presented here. In this program, service is classified into local and express categories. Seven indicators were chosen to monitor transit performance on a periodic basis. Three indicators were selected to establish standards to be achieved by all fixed-route service operators in Los Angeles County. Compliance with these standards will determine eligibility for discretionary funds (representing 5 percent of operating assistance) in the future. The methodology for quantifying loss of subsidy funds if an operator falls below the established standards is also described. The performance guidelines merit consideration for two reasons. First, they represent an attempt by a large metropolitan area to control transit costs, and second they initiate performance-based funding allocation rather than funding based on demographic characteristics or operating deficits. Both reasons are substantial advancements in the theory and application of performance-based guidelines to transit-financing issues.

Key concepts: Public transport, Subsidy, Transit (satellite), Transport engineering, Metropolitan area, Incentive, Legislation, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
PERFORMANCE-BASED FUNDING-ALLOCATION GUIDELINES FOR TRANSIT OPERATORS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY — Research Paper | ScholarLens