2009Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Phase equilibria in igneous systems

Anthony R. Philpotts, Jay J. Ague

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION When first encountered, the great variety of igneous rocks and the large number of names and textural terms used to describe them can be bewildering. Diagrams showing the relations between mineralogical parameters, such as the composition of feldspar, abundance of ferromagnesian minerals, and so on, or the variation between major chemical constituents, provide a means of attaching names to rocks, but they do not, in themselves, provide an explanation for the compositions and frequency of occurrence of rock types. These diagrams can be likened to the periodic table of the elements; they provide a means of classifying, but the underlying important factors justifying such a classification have to be sought elsewhere. Thermodynamics provides the rationale for rock compositions. Ideally, when a magma crystallizes at a given pressure and temperature, an assemblage of minerals is formed that provides the minimum free energy possible for that particular bulk composition under the existing conditions. A close approach to this ideal situation is common in igneous rocks, particularly plutonic ones, and even when equilibrium is not achieved, mineral assemblages can still be understood in terms of reactions that are striving to bring about this minimization of free energy. Thermodynamics, therefore, provides a simple explanation for the mineralogical composition of igneous rocks, and as will be seen later, it can also be used to account for the composition of magmas.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

INTRODUCTION When first encountered, the great variety of igneous rocks and the large number of names and textural terms used to describe them can be bewildering. Diagrams showing the relations between mineralogical parameters, such as the composition of feldspar, abundance of ferromagnesian minerals, and so on, or the variation between major chemical constituents, provide a means of attaching names to rocks, but they do not, in themselves, provide an explanation for the compositions and frequency of occurrence of rock types. These diagrams can be likened to the periodic table of the elements; they provide a means of classifying, but the underlying important factors justifying such a classification have to be sought elsewhere. Thermodynamics provides the rationale for rock compositions. Ideally, when a magma crystallizes at a given pressure and temperature, an assemblage of minerals is formed that provides the minimum free energy possible for that particular bulk composition under the existing conditions. A close approach to this ideal situation is common in igneous rocks, particularly plutonic ones, and even when equilibrium is not achieved, mineral assemblages can still be understood in terms of reactions that are striving to bring about this minimization of free energy. Thermodynamics, therefore, provides a simple explanation for the mineralogical composition of igneous rocks, and as will be seen later, it can also be used to account for the composition of magmas.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

INTRODUCTION When first encountered, the great variety of igneous rocks and the large number of names and textural terms used to describe them can be bewildering. Diagrams showing the relations between mineralogical parameters, such as the composition of feldspar, abundance of ferromagnesian minerals, and so on, or the variation between major chemical constituents, provide a means of attaching names to rocks, but they do not, in themselves, provide an explanation for the compositions and frequency of occurrence of rock types. These diagrams can be likened to the periodic table of the elements; they provide a means of classifying, but the underlying important factors justifying such a classification have to be sought elsewhere. Thermodynamics provides the rationale for rock compositions. Ideally, when a magma crystallizes at a given pressure and temperature, an assemblage of minerals is formed that provides the minimum free energy possible for that particular bulk composition under the existing conditions. A close approach to this ideal situation is common in igneous rocks, particularly plutonic ones, and even when equilibrium is not achieved, mineral assemblages can still be understood in terms of reactions that are striving to bring about this minimization of free energy. Thermodynamics, therefore, provides a simple explanation for the mineralogical composition of igneous rocks, and as will be seen later, it can also be used to account for the composition of magmas.

Key concepts: Igneous rock, Feldspar, Table (database), Geology, Mineralogy, Variety (cybernetics), Geochemistry, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Phase equilibria in igneous systems — Research Paper | ScholarLens