1975Special report - Transportation Research Board, National Research CouncilRequires access

POLITICAL AND PUBLIC POLICY ISSUES RELATED TO DEMAND-RESPONSIVE TRANSPORTATION. SPEAKER 2

K Orski

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The paper focuses on UMTA's view relating to the potential of paratransit or demand-responsive transportation (DRT), and discusses some of the policy implications. The future of community paratransit service, characterized by the flexible routing and scheduling of small vehicles to provide shared-occupancy, door-to-door, personalized transportation service within smaller communities and suburban neighborhoods is vertually assured. However, the biggest scope for the future expansion of paratransit lies in its becoming an element of integrated metropolitan transportation systems. An effective urban transportation system, one that will provide a high level of service at the least cost, requires a mix of vehicles, service levels, and operating regimens, tailored to the different demand conditions, widening densities, and travel patterns prevailing in particular corridors and subareas of the metropolitan region. UMTA will encourage applicants to be more mindful of the immediate and near-term transportation needs of metropolitan areas. UMTA will also want to know to what extent long-range transportation plans can be implemented in a more time-phased, incremental fashion. Examples of potential new paratransit applications are listed, and quoted as examples of the ways in which paratransit could complement (not compete with) existing transportation services. UMTA would like to know whether prearranged feeder service to line-haul commuter buses and trains could be provided by private operators at a cost that commuters could afford. It is emphasized that single-mode transportation systems, be it paratransit, rail, or freeway systems, cannot offer a solution to all transportation problems.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The paper focuses on UMTA's view relating to the potential of paratransit or demand-responsive transportation (DRT), and discusses some of the policy implications. The future of community paratransit service, characterized by the flexible routing and scheduling of small vehicles to provide shared-occupancy, door-to-door, personalized transportation service within smaller communities and suburban neighborhoods is vertually assured. However, the biggest scope for the future expansion of paratransit lies in its becoming an element of integrated metropolitan transportation systems. An effective urban transportation system, one that will provide a high level of service at the least cost, requires a mix of vehicles, service levels, and operating regimens, tailored to the different demand conditions, widening densities, and travel patterns prevailing in particular corridors and subareas of the metropolitan region. UMTA will encourage applicants to be more mindful of the immediate and near-term transportation needs of metropolitan areas. UMTA will also want to know to what extent long-range transportation plans can be implemented in a more time-phased, incremental fashion. Examples of potential new paratransit applications are listed, and quoted as examples of the ways in which paratransit could complement (not compete with) existing transportation services. UMTA would like to know whether prearranged feeder service to line-haul commuter buses and trains could be provided by private operators at a cost that commuters could afford. It is emphasized that single-mode transportation systems, be it paratransit, rail, or freeway systems, cannot offer a solution to all transportation problems.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The paper focuses on UMTA's view relating to the potential of paratransit or demand-responsive transportation (DRT), and discusses some of the policy implications. The future of community paratransit service, characterized by the flexible routing and scheduling of small vehicles to provide shared-occupancy, door-to-door, personalized transportation service within smaller communities and suburban neighborhoods is vertually assured. However, the biggest scope for the future expansion of paratransit lies in its becoming an element of integrated metropolitan transportation systems. An effective urban transportation system, one that will provide a high level of service at the least cost, requires a mix of vehicles, service levels, and operating regimens, tailored to the different demand conditions, widening densities, and travel patterns prevailing in particular corridors and subareas of the metropolitan region. UMTA will encourage applicants to be more mindful of the immediate and near-term transportation needs of metropolitan areas. UMTA will also want to know to what extent long-range transportation plans can be implemented in a more time-phased, incremental fashion. Examples of potential new paratransit applications are listed, and quoted as examples of the ways in which paratransit could complement (not compete with) existing transportation services. UMTA would like to know whether prearranged feeder service to line-haul commuter buses and trains could be provided by private operators at a cost that commuters could afford. It is emphasized that single-mode transportation systems, be it paratransit, rail, or freeway systems, cannot offer a solution to all transportation problems.

Key concepts: Paratransit, Metropolitan area, Transport engineering, Public transport, Service (business), Scope (computer science), Transportation planning, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
POLITICAL AND PUBLIC POLICY ISSUES RELATED TO DEMAND-RESPONSIVE TRANSPORTATION. SPEAKER 2 — Research Paper | ScholarLens