2000Harvard Educational ReviewRequires access

Sociology and Qualitative Methodologies in Educational Research.

Mary Haywood Metz

Open publisher page 39 citations

Abstract

In this article, Mary Haywood Metz traces the development of qualitative methodology in sociology from its early roots in the Chicago School, through its status as a marginalized tradition within sociology, and to its current widespread use in educational research. She makes important distinctions between qualitative methods and qualitative methodology, and distinguishes between anthropological and sociological approaches to ethnography. Metz also discusses how qualitative sociology, in focusing on the internal processes of schools, has contributed to the study of both teaching and schools as organizations. Finally, in discussing the future of qualitative research in education, Metz expresses concern that certain types of research may overwhelm and replace ethnographic methodology by co-opting the label of qualitalive research, and proposes a methodological detente..

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this article, Mary Haywood Metz traces the development of qualitative methodology in sociology from its early roots in the Chicago School, through its status as a marginalized tradition within sociology, and to its current widespread use in educational research. She makes important distinctions between qualitative methods and qualitative methodology, and distinguishes between anthropological and sociological approaches to ethnography. Metz also discusses how qualitative sociology, in focusing on the internal processes of schools, has contributed to the study of both teaching and schools as organizations. Finally, in discussing the future of qualitative research in education, Metz expresses concern that certain types of research may overwhelm and replace ethnographic methodology by co-opting the label of qualitalive research, and proposes a methodological detente..

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 39 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this article, Mary Haywood Metz traces the development of qualitative methodology in sociology from its early roots in the Chicago School, through its status as a marginalized tradition within sociology, and to its current widespread use in educational research. She makes important distinctions between qualitative methods and qualitative methodology, and distinguishes between anthropological and sociological approaches to ethnography. Metz also discusses how qualitative sociology, in focusing on the internal processes of schools, has contributed to the study of both teaching and schools as organizations. Finally, in discussing the future of qualitative research in education, Metz expresses concern that certain types of research may overwhelm and replace ethnographic methodology by co-opting the label of qualitalive research, and proposes a methodological detente..

Key concepts: Sociology, Qualitative research, Ethnography, Educational research, Sociological research, Research methodology, Epistemology, Social science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sociology and Qualitative Methodologies in Educational Research. — Research Paper | ScholarLens