2015Journal of genetic medicineOpen access

Evaluating the results of the Momguard noninvasive prenatal test

Hae‐Jin Hu, Young-Jun Kwon, Mi‐Jin Oh, Jihun Kim, Dae-Yeon Cho, Dong-Hee Seo

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

JGM from an NT ultrasound and maternal serum tests has been used for noninvasive prenatal test (NIPT) [4].If a test result indicates a sample is 'screen positive', chorionic villus sampling (CVS) or amniocentesis is performed to confirm the result.However, current maternal serum screening tests have a relatively low detection rate (50-95%) and high false-positive rate (5%) [5].CVS and amniocentesis carry the risk of fetal loss, since they are invasive procedures and may present additional emotional burdens for the mother.The discovery of the existence of cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) in maternal plasma in 1997 by Lo et al. [6] led to a new era for NIPT.Within the last two decades, advanced technologies such as digital polymerase chain reaction or massively parallel Evaluating the results of the Momguard noninvasive prenatal test

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

JGM from an NT ultrasound and maternal serum tests has been used for noninvasive prenatal test (NIPT) [4].If a test result indicates a sample is 'screen positive', chorionic villus sampling (CVS) or amniocentesis is performed to confirm the result.However, current maternal serum screening tests have a relatively low detection rate (50-95%) and high false-positive rate (5%) [5].CVS and amniocentesis carry the risk of fetal loss, since they are invasive procedures and may present additional emotional burdens for the mother.The discovery of the existence of cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) in maternal plasma in 1997 by Lo et al. [6] led to a new era for NIPT.Within the last two decades, advanced technologies such as digital polymerase chain reaction or massively parallel Evaluating the results of the Momguard noninvasive prenatal test

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

JGM from an NT ultrasound and maternal serum tests has been used for noninvasive prenatal test (NIPT) [4].If a test result indicates a sample is 'screen positive', chorionic villus sampling (CVS) or amniocentesis is performed to confirm the result.However, current maternal serum screening tests have a relatively low detection rate (50-95%) and high false-positive rate (5%) [5].CVS and amniocentesis carry the risk of fetal loss, since they are invasive procedures and may present additional emotional burdens for the mother.The discovery of the existence of cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) in maternal plasma in 1997 by Lo et al. [6] led to a new era for NIPT.Within the last two decades, advanced technologies such as digital polymerase chain reaction or massively parallel Evaluating the results of the Momguard noninvasive prenatal test

Key concepts: Prenatal diagnosis, Test (biology), Prenatal screening, Medicine, Obstetrics, Pregnancy, Genetics, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluating the results of the Momguard noninvasive prenatal test — Research Paper | ScholarLens